Thursday, March 27

"Long have I waited for your coming home to me..."

16 months later,
Paul Johnson-Reuben's family welcomes him home.


By RICHARD MERYHEW, Star Tribune
Last update: March 27, 2008 - 10:17 PM

They don't know how or when he died or whether he was tortured. They don't know where his body was found or who is responsible for his abduction and death.

But 16 months after Paul Johnson-Reuben disappeared after being kidnapped with four other security contractors in southern Iraq, his family and friends finally know this:

He's coming home.

"I am thankful ... that he has made it home," Quinten Reuben, 32, of Minneapolis, said Thursday of his older brother. "For me, that's a small victory, that we can give him a respectful funeral and put him to rest."

----------------------------------

Come back to Me with all your heart.
Don’t let fear keep us apart.
Long have I waited for your coming home to Me
and living deeply our new life.

The wilderness will lead you to your heart
where I will speak.
Long have I waited for you coming home to Me
and living deeply our new life.

Integrity and justice,
with tenderness you shall know.
Long have I waited for your coming home to Me
and living deeply our new life.

You shall sleep secure with peace;
faithfulness will be your joy.
Long have I waited for your coming home to Me
and living deeply our new life
.

(Gregory Norbert, The Benedictine Foundation of the State of Vermont)

Wednesday, March 26

Happiness is...

walking to work!

-----------------

"And I'll gladly stand up...
next to you and defend her still today
Cause there ain't no doubt, I love this land
God Bless the U.S.A."

Thursday, March 20

Previews of November excuses to come...

"In some ways this controversy has actually shaken me up a little bit and gotten me back into remembering that, you know, the odds of me getting elected have always been lower than some of the other conventional candidates," the Illinois senator told CNN in an interview that aired late Wednesday
.

Right, it wasn't your political judgment, or your lack of merits the votes don't like. It was that you're not a "conventional candidate."

Speaking of, it really is not too late to salvage your political future, Sen. Obama, and publicly acknowledge that it's not your time right now, and you'd end up in a stronger position working to support the Democratic team, and not your own interests. Concede now, and concentrate on ending 8 years of Republican executive rule?

Because sadly, many of us out here think that if the party splits now on special- interests v. working-class lines, it doesn't really matter who runs in 2012; the Democratic party itself will cease to operate in the future.

Do the right thing, strongly support a credible candidate who has a shot against McCain in the fall (Yes You Can! The polls can be overcome if your unity skills, and willing to reach out and work with others are what they're touted...) Clinton-Obama coming together now, before any more damage is inflicted, with plenty of work can overcome the Rev. Wright seeming hatred and ignorance that many will be discussing over their Easter brunches.

Abraham Lincoln was killed on Good Friday, and his death had implications for the future reconciliation of the South and North. "Let em up easy" kind of died with the man. Ending your presidential bid tomorrow, if it's clear already that you alone have no shot at taking the presidency in November, might be not only a surprise, but the wisest move you can make now in working together to unite the Democrats to victory. Put some action behind those words, if indeed you meant them for all of us, and it's not just about winning the big prize for you and yours this year.

I guarantee that this kind of move would leave the pundits scratching their heads, would be a bold leadership move, and would guarantee you plenty of time to help heal the wounds in this already economically painful war time that would allow the country to begin thinking ahead about the hard path and sacrifices necessary. Oh, and God Bless America; Yes We Can! Be a leader who can step up when it matters, not a loser who makes excuses and blames others. -- Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country...

Speaking of Andrew...

I hesitate to accuse him of hitting the bottle again, and I'm not sure if he's got a medical marijuana prescription to help with his often-discussed medical condition, but I really am hoping this is somehow a chemically enhanced pretty thought, and he's not thinking seriously in linking.

Some see the enormous potential that Obama has to transform global politics:

"We Israelis traditionally look at the candidates of a US election through the very specific prism of "whether or not he or she would be good for Israel." Some of my friends were surprised that I was so enthusiastic about Obama: "Clinton would be much better for us," they claimed. But I believe that what is good for Israel is a US president who is good for the world. A US president with whom the Palestinian boys would identify would make Israel, and the whole world, more secure. It would inspire people everywhere to embrace what America represents - modernity, freedom, civil society, and democracy. I will be watching this election very closely because all six billion of us will be affected. And while I can't vote for Obama myself, I will certainly pray that Americans will."


I mean, "A US president with whom the Palestinian boys would identify?? Bwah-ha-ha-ha! You've got to be kidding me. The impoverished kids in Gaza are going to suddenly go pro-America because "he's got darker skin, like me" Is that the thinking? And you linked it, Andrew? Maybe it's happy pills he's taking, or an early holiday celebration...

November can't come soon enough to end this silly season. I'm all having my moments of hopin' and wishin' too, but the consequences in the end to be paid when you're not grounded in reality can prove pretty painful. And that one was the dumbest I think I've heard all campaign season.

THE POLITICS OF the Obama predicament. "I think the "O'Mentum" has been stopped dead in its tracks."

Weirdly, the "O'Mentum" ceased on St. Patrick's day . . .


No, Glenn. More accurately, the momentum was well stopped by March 4. The free ride he was given during February -- ironically Black History month* -- came to an end much earlier than March 17. Just takes a while for some of those "Instant" commentators to catch up to the story, is all...
-------------

*Remember just a few years ago, when the hope was we could rise to the level throughout the 12 months of the year to incorporate "black" history, and the achievements of "black" scientists, leaders, and Americans into the curriculum as a whole? Not that it should be phased out those special February acknowledgements, just that they would fall to the wayside as there was no need to have solely one "special" month, when such recognition was woven well into the fabric of the entire year and history of the country.

It was around the time many were hoping there would be no special sections in the bookstores for "gay" authors, but that they too would be incorporated on the regular shelves. Readers reading for quality of content, not the author's private life details. Sadly, identity politics is re-emerging, and will continue to live so long as there are those "stars" who profit by its continual exploitation. Sullivan, Paglia, and now in his choice of Christian leadership, it appears, Barack Obama. The first two need to continually flout their sexuality in their "work" to get ahead (Note to Camille -- you had the hots for Elizabeth Taylor. We get it. And many people think John O'Hara first, not ET, when they think Butterfield 8. The culture continues to cheapen...) And in the Illinois senator's case -- a church where he could cement his "blackness" for political gain -- in order to advance more quickly in Chicago politics.

I wonder how far back, how much internal damage will be sustained from these decisions to exploit the special interests cards, and continually let us know what exactly it is that makes one special and sets him off from other workers in the field. Without their public sexuality, Paglia and Sullivan don't have much... Without his biracial background, Obama would still be toiling in the legislature. Best to earn your way up, I think, and not take the easy path that allows you to advance past others putting in their time and work too in reaching for the prize.

After all, the quality usually ends up lacking in the final product. And it's hard to spin results, final scores, so to speak...

Tuesday, March 18

I have only one class left this year with my 9th grade religious students. I'll miss them. Perusing the local high school high honor rolls, I see a good majority of their names. I'm wondering if this being my first year teaching and all, the director assigned me the smarter of the bunch, when splitting the class with the other teacher, who has taught for a few years now. Maybe it was just the luck of the draw.

Going into the class in October, I felt prepared but not exactly sure what route the course would take. I suppose good teaching is always like that -- you tailor it to the group you find sitting before you, planning in some room to remain flexible and to address issues as they arise. That we did. There was a "racial incident" that got newsplay at the suburban school, along with a planned foodfight that parents of the disciplined students found too severe. (Have I mentioned here that deliberately wasting good food is one of my pet peeves? And at 17 and 18, what would surely be considered a misdeamnor if it occured in a mall food court say, such an act just seems ... disrespectful to others.) Though it was upperclassmen involved in both, my freshman were willing to talk about what they thought of the news articles compared to their daily take on high school life.

Two weeks ago, somehow the conversation led me to note that Mendel was a monk. Before assuming an administrative position that took him away from his gardening and studies, he found in religious life the necessary time to pursue his passions. My point was, faith and science can co-exist. I wanted them to remember that, because somedays it seems religion/spirituality is unnecessarily mocked by those who assume they know better, and sometimes we remain ignorant out of fear of upsetting tradition.

I also brought up -- because they do enjoy the tough trivia question, if anyone could tell me the two famous men born on February 12, 1809. It only took seconds for the first one to identify Lincoln, but even with further clues, no one came up with Charles Darwin. We talked a bit about how his learning was thought at that time to indeed, rock the world, and again how we can appreciate the old stories yet reconcile them with later knowledge as man's understanding continues to grow. (I also told them to remember this factoid next February for the bicentennial birthday celebrations -- maybe they could win a trivia bet with their friends or something.)

This being Holy Week, and the schools being out, we're off. And next week we'll meet in our individual classrooms for only about 10 minutes before returning to the gym/common area for a wrap-up celebration that includes some kind of food. It was a good year -- over so quickly especially considering that two or three of the snow days that cancelled school this year saw the storms coming in on Wednesdays, the evening we meet. Or maybe the first year always passes quickly...

----------------

Onto today's political news:
It looks like the Supreme Court will find an individual right to gun ownership in the Constitution, if those listening to today's oral arguments are reading the tea leaves correctly.

Betcha thought I was going to lead with Barack Obama's speech on racial issues. Like with Darwin and Lincoln, it's a toss up to some, of course, which one ultimately has greater ranking in the importance of the day. (Nothing against Lincoln -- he was a great man for the times, but I do wonder if he had not been born or survived milkfever into adulthood say, if another could have also assumed the reigns in urging the generals to continue pursuing Lee's army and not ceding any land to the Confederacy. He got it, the importance of the country's union, as did Andrew Jackson in an earlier day. But Darwin I have to believe, would not have been so easily replaced so soon. More mind work than inspirational leadership, more unique than just stepping up as the times. For the record, I do admire them both for their courage and intelligence.

Here's my take on today's second major American news story:
Barack Obama seemed tired to me. And every station where I saw snippets, including I think BBC, also ran the "God damn America" rant. In the end, no matter how heartfelt, it was words. Words are powerless unless or until people act on them. And many will wonder why an intelligent man chose to confront those ideas only when he was ultimately called on them. Wouldn't it have been better to push back much earlier, if the leadership skills touted were indeed as strong as some say? I think so...

I also don't so much buy into the, "We all disagree with words we hear in our temples, churches and pulpits." It's a fine phrase, and somewhat true, but accepting passively is not everyone's style. Some keep looking... some question verbally at an appropriate but more immediate time... some drop out, either temporarily or for the long run. It's an individual thing, sure, and we've all got our own stories we could tell...

Myself, I skipped Mass the weekend our local diocesean churches were required to play the Bishop's message urging a vote supporting the constitutional state amendment against expanding the definition of civil marriage. Maybe it's my own constitution, my inner temperment, but I knew that would not be healthy for me to sit and listen to, and there are some things I just haven't learned yet to tune out without physical effect. My choice. Plus, being raised in the Chicago diocese and with clergy in the family, my understanding is that the Church is not supposed to preach politically from the pulpit. The "requirement" that all churches play the message or face discipline seemed odd to me, and while it made me think less perhaps of the man behind in this diocese leadership post, I still admire him strongly for the leadership of the office. Again, my choice.

Reading the tea leaves of today, I still hold out hope that Barack Obama will pursue his passions outside of politics, or in a lesser office than Commander-in-Chief. I still believe that Hillary Clinton is the strongest opponent against John McCain in the fall, and that Commander-in-Chief really isn't the appropriate vehicle to pursue a mission of racial healing, or fuzzy social advancement. Vote for him as president of an Outreach organization -- sure? See him as a Martin Luther King type, advocating for the causes he believes the country as a whole needs? Definitely could see him in that role, if he thinks his background and career path have led him to that mission today.

But a wartime president? With a faltering economy? And plenty of white conservative soldiers fighting abroad? I just don't think this is the man, nor the most pressing issue, for our current times. Of course many will say he didn't choose to play the race card, it was played on him. But then the follow-up question, of course, is why Barack Obama, first-term senator? Why him? Why now? With Hillary Clinton, at least, there is a track record, an understanding of what is driving her, and why now is the time. Ditto John McCain. That's what makes the Tony Rezko allegations so troubling. Perhaps Sen. Obama truly believes the man was just trying to help, in bankrolling his earlier campaigns and helping him afford the Kenwood mansion. (And have you seen the aerial views? A mansion surely it is...) Perhaps he truly believes there was to be no payback time, no agenda. That Mr. Rezko's types can have sordid histories, yet just like helping a fellow out because it makes him feel good.

My knock against McCain is based both on his future (can he handle the job? Why couldn't he beat George W. Bush 8 years ago?) and his past (what has he really accomplished and I do mean effectively for all his touted years of national service. Immigration, and McCain-Feingold are just two I'm not impressed with, and I won't even touch the P.O.W. victim accomplishments.

I don't mind being in a minority: I think moderation is called for now, plodding along, and I think Clinton is the closest thing we've got to reality in recognizing the road ahead, what the priorities are, and what can and cannot be accomplished politically. In one hundred, or even two hundred years, we might not remember her birthdate, but look at how many other workers who helped us incrementally progress she would be in good company with.

I don't want to see Barack Obama lose big in November and shatter so many dreams, including presumably the one he spoke of leading himself today. Nor do I want McCain to further compound the country's current problems, whether he stands to personally gain or not.

So my prediction? The Supreme Court will find an individual right... though tempered by plenty of regulations on the ground. Progress: the wheels of justice grind plenty slowly at times, with reason.

Hope you had a forward-looking Tuesday. The seasons are indeed changing here. The first day of Spring fell on Ruth's birthday, and we always said there were plenty waiting on it...

Monday, March 17

Irish

If you ever go across the sea to Ireland,
Then maybe at the closing of your day,
You will sit and watch the moon rise over Claddagh,
And see the sun go down on Galway Bay.

Just to hear again the ripple of the trout stream,
The women in the meadow making hay.
Just to sit beside a turf fire in the cabin,
And watch the barefoot gosoons at their play.

For the breezes blowin' o'er the sea from Ireland
Are perfumed by the heather as they blow
And the women in the uplands diggin' praties
Speak a language that the strangers do not know.

For the stangers came and tried to teach us their way.
They scorned us just for bein' what we are.
But they might as well go chasing after moon beams,
Or light a penny candle from a star.

And if there's is going to be a life hereafter,
And
somehow, I am sure there's going to be,
Then I pray my God will let me make my heaven,
In that dear land across the Irish sea.


American
There's a reason for the sunshiny sky
There's a reason why I'm feeling so high
Must be the season when those love lights shine all around us.

So let that feeling grab you deep inside
And send you reeling where your love can't hide
And then go stealing through the moonlit night with your lover.

Just let your love flow like a mountain stream
And let your love grow with the smallest of dreams
And let your love show and you'll know what I mean: it's the season.

Let your love fly like a bird on the wing
And let your love bind you to all living things
And let your love shine and you'll know what I mean: that's the reason.

There's a reason for the warm sweet nights
And there's a reason for the candle lights
Must be the season when those love lights shine all around us.

So let that wonder take you into space
And lay you under its loving embrace
Just feel the thunder as it warms your face, you can't hold back.

Just let your love flow like a mountain stream
And let your love grow with the smallest of dreams
And let your love show and you'll know what I mean: it's the season.

Let your love fly like a bird on the wing
And let your love bind you to all living things
And let your love shine and you'll know what I mean: that's the reason.

Just let your love flow like a mountain stream
And let your love grow with the smallest of dreams
And let your love show and you'll know what I mean: it's the season.

Let your love fly like a bird on the wing
And let your love bind you to all living things
And let your love shine and you'll know what I mean: that's the reason...

"The researchers conclude that initiating flight was simply a matter of learning to flap at a particular angle." I mean, who knew?

Friday, March 14

Maybe Susan Estrich should have been the one running for president.*

Because when I heard Hillary Clinton apologized not only for Geraldine Ferraro's comments, but also for her husband -- much belatedly after South Carolina -- I figured she just can't be the fighter we were hoping for. Too afraid, apparently.

I'll never be able to endorse a first-term Illinois senator for the highest country in the land, not in these times. (So don't bother pulling out the Lincoln! details of the mid-19th century please. I'm not ignorant of history; it's just not my first time around so I'm not so easily dazzled by the comparisons.)

Not sure if I'll join the ranks of smarter, wiser people who realize why voting really is a waste of time. (Ask Florida or Michigan voters for that one.) Or if I'll help give Mr. McCain the prize he so desperately wants, that will probably be the end of him. He's not up to the challenges either... Probably much will depend on who he chooses as a running mate, whether I find something better to do next November.

Keep fighting, Hillary. If that's what you call it. Don't understand how you could take time to apologize for honesty, who gave you that advice and why it was taken. Maybe it will be for the best another spectacular Democratic loss in November, and the dissolution of the party as we know it.

Without honesty, without history, without courage ... all the spoils in the world don't mean much, eh?
-------------------------
*No offense, but like some wonderful players turned coaches, it seems she doesn't have that great a winning record as an advisor. Sure there's intelligence there, but somehow it doesn't ever seem to translate in the final score...

Thursday, March 13

Officials of the Chaldean Church in Iraq said they had received a call telling them where the body was buried. The cause of death was not clear. An official of the morgue in Mosul said the archbishop, who was 65 and had health problems, including high blood pressure and diabetes, might have died of natural causes.

Church officials said Thursday, however, that Archbishop Rahho was shot in the leg when he was abducted on Feb. 29. Gunmen sprayed his car with bullets, killed two bodyguards and shoved the archbishop into the trunk of a car, the church officials said. In the darkness, he managed to pull out his cellphone and call the church, telling officials not to pay a ransom for his release, they said.

“He believed that this money would not be paid for good works and would be used for killing and more evil actions,” the officials said.
...
In the last few years, Mosul has been a difficult place for Christians. The archbishop’s kidnapping followed a series of attacks in January on Christian churches. Last June, a priest and three companions were shot and killed in the archbishop’s church. In January 2005, Archbishop George Yasilious, of another church in Mosul, was kidnapped and later released. In October 2006, an Orthodox priest, Boulos Iskander, was beheaded after he was kidnapped and attempts to ransom him failed.

The number of Chaldeans in Iraq has dropped by at least a million since the end of Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship, though the Chaldeans are still the largest Christian group in the country. Priests have estimated that fewer than 500,000 remain in Iraq.

The Chaldean Church is an Eastern Rite church affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church but retaining its own customs and rites.


It's the 5th anniversary coming up, America. And we can't justify it for cheap gas prices either...

Wednesday, March 12

I think Andrew's hitting the bottle again:

The Ferraro flap has left me feeling queasy. Not just because racial polarization is always an ugly thing; not just because the condescension toward a minority is cringe-inducing; not just because these cycles of blame and counter-blame can go on and on and wound more and more ... but because it is inherently corrosive of a multicultural polity, and will, in the long run, benefit no one but those who cannot appeal to the public beyond crass interest group grievance.

The one indisputably positive aspect of the Obama candidacy - to left or right - has been his remarkable ability to make a case for his nomination without relying on this kind of identity politics and victim-mongering. That he doesn't shrink from minority status and pretend that his blackness doesn't matter is not the same thing. His ability to both represent a black man and yet represent a figure beyond a black man is the core of the historic salience of his candidacy. It's why a gay man living in many different worlds feels that Obama can and will move all of us forward. It is why so many with complex identities and revulsion for racial or gender groupthink have been given new hope this time around. It shows that he has actually moved beyond the kind of thinking that lay behind Ferraro's original nomination and the toxic politics of the 1970s left.

I hope this stuff ends soon - and that the Obama camp does not degenerate into constantly being offended, however justified the offense is.


Florida pushed their primary election up, because they wanted their voters' voices to matter. Now, some would have them silenced because it looks like their man would not win in a "do-over" primary election there.

Take away Barack Obama's color and race: how many first-term senators with questionable background connections, with no legislative history, no military background, and no real track record of leadership, would be in his position today, even with an excellent oratory? None. We'd be skeptics -- prove it, give us some solid evidence that what you're preaching about your judgment is true. Clinton has show pragmatism, grace and courage under fire. She has shown she can win against real opponents. Many may wish to paint her as just another Laura Bush, taking the typical First Lady role and baking cookies during her time in the White House. I think she was more the farmer's wife -- just as involved in her husband's wins, and suffering his losses all the same. No, I don't think we're in danger of her genitals overruling her good judgment though, and I do think she is a pragmatist at heart.

Isn't she the true moderate in this one, midway between McCain's posturing as BushIII, and Obama's liberal promises and record? I think so. That's why I'm supporting her, not because she's a woman. So are other black women too, I think. It's an insult to say we're all just in it for the identity politics. Just like it's insulting to say that working-class whites are voting the bigot ticket. Maybe... they just understand getting the job done. That sometimes the man with the best-pressed shirt and cleanest language and most pedigrees is not the one you should be listening to on how to get a job done. Plenty of older black Democrats are backing Hillary too, I think. Maybe they don't want to see an unready black candidate fail in November, because he hasn't worked his way up, paid his dues, would be an unappealing choice as commander-in-chief against the conservative McCain.

There's no need for Clinton to apologize for Ferraro. Maybe it's a conversation that needs to happen. Plenty of people have theories about why so many boys of working-class whites are failing in the classrooms and not advancing to colleges. Here's mine: maybe they are sickened by the hypocrisy and are giving up. Let's say you earn the same grades as your black classmate. You score higher on standardized tests than your grades indicate, yet are routinely left behind while those with more appealing demographic characteristics such as color are in fact "competed for" by the colleges and universities. There're no preferences given for white males, as far as I know... Would you want to attend schools, where you're made to pay the price for all those Americans who in years past excused their discriminatory behavior for the systematic advantages they took in the Jim Crow years, "just playing by the rules"? I don't think I would. With girls, it's different. For whatever reason, we don't hold so much against the white ones. Often, their working-class girls are welcomed and truth be told, with marriage what it is, it is easier for girls to assimilate and date/marry their way up. Not true for so many working-class white boys, who must rely on themselves...

Without the race angle, what exactly does "YES WE CAN!" refer to? Taking back the government on behalf of the inexperienced? I don't think so. Note that above, Andrew himself can't resist throwing in the "gay man" card. He too is special, and no doubt in my mind would not be where he is at today without the gay "catholic" / HIV positive card to play. He's no conservative; changes his mind about as often as he changes his socks; and seems to form his opinions around the polls. Pragmatism. That's what we need now. Somebody with good solid judgment, somebody who can fight tomorrow's battles and is not stuck in the yesterday. ("Please don't attack us any more. I wouldn't have voted to invade Iraq!" is just not a credible strategy in picking up that red phone.)

I've been listening: I think the policies Obama has outlined are much too liberal and unpractical for my tastes. And I think the country needs a break from the Bush/Cheney philosophy. I think we should let the voters in Florida and Michigan have their preferences considered now, as surely their votes will matter come November. To me, Clinton is that moderate candidate. She's not relying on white liberal guilt over past sins to get her elected, like Obama is. I think his message of "unity" is hollow, if it only rings true should he be chosen. And painting those not in the tank as identity politic simps, or worse, bigots is not going to help America. "Divided We Further Fall". If Obama wants to focus the heat on himself, rather than Bush/Cheney, that is his perogative. I wish he'd use better judgment, but I believe every man (person) in American is free to fall. But people like Andrew -- not even a citizen here -- would pull the rest of the country down with him.

Does he not remember the O.J. Simpson verdict and the illogical celebrations based on rhetoric but scant evidence? Does he want to encourage or elevate some on the backs of others just as qualified, as affirmative action does to all the current genetic "losers" out here? Is he really willing to throw away all of his supposed conservative, non-biased principles to get the results he wants. (Aside: I don't believe in discrimination against HIV+ individuals either. But I can definitely understand why the policy for immigrants to America stands and we would currently find it pragmatic to exclude before throwing open the gates. Betcha he could too, if the proposed revisions wouldn't benefit him personally, allowing him not only a Massachusetts marriage, but also American citizenship. Funny though, I don't remember him being a big Kerry supporter...)

Changing your mind about Obama later won't work, just as we can't *snap* undo Iraq, or begin only now to question the pricetag it's costing us all. The time for that was before... The reason the Democratic superdelegates will matter is because of the same FORESIGHT. Understanding that, now -- in Florida and Michigan -- is the time for do-overs. Mea culpas for changing your mind might count in religion and relationships, but it makes harsh little difference out here in the real world. When you feel the consequences -- like those working class white male students -- you can either agitate for change, or you can give up and give in. When you benefit based on special preferences ... naturally you won't want to change the rules as they stand; in fact, sometimes you're even blind to what's happening today, nevermind to what's coming down the pipe. Geraldine Ferraro -- for all her grey hair styled so mannishly these days -- say what you will, is not blind. Nor I would posit, is she a bigot.

Hey, even Maureen Dowd agrees There's Something About Barack, and indeed if you read today's column, even the candidate himself has acknowledged politically his great timing and legacy.
Last Friday, Ms. Ferraro, who is on Hillary’s national finance committee, told The Daily Breeze, a small newspaper in Torrance, Calif.:

“If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color), he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”

Obama acknowledged when he arrived in the Senate that he got more attention, his big book deal and his celebrity, because he is not white. He was only the third black senator elected since Reconstruction.

But as he campaigned here Tuesday, he was outraged at Ferraro’s comments. “They are divisive,” he said. “I think anybody who understands the history of this country knows they are patently absurd.”


The problem for America is ... this is no time to be looking back.

And anybody who thinks this is the time for futher sowing seeds of division solely for political gain, surely hasn't been doing any reaping these past five seasons. Or the 35 before that either, for that matter. God Help Us All. Something tells me, we're one country that's really going to need it.

Monday, March 10

Offered, rejected,

...time to move on.

I don't think anyone suggested Obama was ready to be Veep... just that strategically, it was good to at least offer and let him reject it. Classy like that.

Now, he's got only himself to blame come next year when he's "just" a first-term Illinois senator...

Jim Webb, that's who I'd like to see Clinton paired with. I suspect I'm not alone on that count, either.

Winter weekend.

I must say, it's been a pretty good weekend, and winter, here. Lots of snow and cold sure, but knock wood, I've been pretty healthy, eating good, and getting a lot of reading done.

[Started writing this post Sunday night; posted on Monday]

Yesterday, Mal and I went to a Canoe/Kayak convention in the local convention center. I paid $10 for the day; he paid $15 for a 3-day pass that let him go back today as well. Now he missed last year, but has gone a few times in years past. Pretty much, I always thought, "That's not my thing." No fan of crowds, no fan of overpriced (to me) merchandise, I'm pretty happy with my decade+ old kayak, my slip over the head comfortable PFD, and my collapsible paddle.

You know how people see cars as different things? Some see "Status Symbol", like a commentary on style, wealth or lately, how "green" they are. Some see it as a tool, though, just a thing to get you places you want to be. That's pretty much me, though as you can tell from the photos, I do tend to form an attachment to my things over time. But again, more as a tool to get you there.

I loved it when I started paddling this kayak -- an Old Towne Otter -- as it was lightweight (twenty something pounds) and easy to maneuver. Well built with an iron bar down the middle stabilizing it, even the "deluxe" version" with the wider fold-down seat, adjustable foot rests, and drink holder between the legs for a water bottle. Neato colored one too. I got it up North, though I brought it down and kept it on Lake Wingra the first year of law school.

For a few hundred dollars, this boat has taken me places you simply can't go with a bigger boat. I've got an anchor, and have fished off it, but for the most part, I like to stick to paddling the rivers and smaller lakes. You can turn it around easy, and get into the lily pads though I try not to much disturb the nesting and mating activities of the others.

That's it. That's about all I could tell you about my boat, definitely less than 5 minutes worth. Now if you want to talk about the rivers and streams up North, that's another story. Where to put in and take out, what times are best, even the time I was paddling solo in fog on a Hudson lake that probably could qualify as one of the most mysterious feelings in my life -- you could barely see the outline of the shore, which I was trying to keep close to that morning, and the sounds of the geese somewhere out there in the not too far distance ... that I could talk about. But the boat itself, not really.

But like with cars, I've found there are plenty of people who would spend all day discussing options, comparing prices, yadda yadda. To me, that's time wasted where you could be out doing-- driving, getting somewhere, in this case paddling. It's one reason I don't think much of "women's kayaking groups". The whole idea is to break free, to get out, not to cluster up in groups, giggling and talking about your strokes. Either you can do it, or you can't.

It's one reason why after a season, even Lake Wingra felt limiting, though it was a nice getaway to cut across the lake on weekends when there was no wake traffic and there were limited options for getting away in Madison proper.

So when Mal asked me if I wanted to go yesterday, spend time with coughing people inside on a sunny day, my first instinct was again to decline. But I'm glad I went: from 9:30 to 4:30, I was treated to 8 presentations, 5 or 6 magnificent and only two duds. He had circled the ones he wanted to see, and several were offered today too. For a few, we overlapped in our tastes. For some, we went our own ways. For the last hour or two, and today, he spent time in the giant commercial end of it -- the "for sale" part of the convention center. I made my way past folks yesterday for about 20 minutes in between presentations to drop off two raffle tickets they gave you coming in -- and to check and see if we were instant winners; we weren't -- and that exposure was plenty enough for me.

Some people like the toys, like "upgrading", like having the latest thing as if that will magically change the experience. Mostly I think, they're not so much doers and goers, as they are talkers. Me? Not so much.

But here are the 6 oral and video presentations I attended that were well worth it:

1) Cliff Jacobson's humorous take on outdoor apparel -- what works in practice and mostly, what doesn't (zippered pants, velcroed hat flaps in the wind). Again my theory there, is find a little wool, thin cotton, good raingear, and stick to it. Less really is more...

2) A great presentation by an amateur (as opposed to "sponsored") from Indiana, on a trip to Canada's Thulon River June 21, 2004 to July 8, and pictures of the wildlife they encountered on the tundra, with some of the ice still breaking up and glacial waters making journeys up any of the tributaries impossible. Still -- too early for bugs!

3) A federal park ranger presenation, including a closing poem that really fit, on "our" river(s) up North. I'm not mentioning names since so many people seem content to pass on these in favor of say Boundary Waters, but I love them. Mal and I don't actually own a tent. A nice hammock for one that encloses over your head if you hang it right, keeping out bugs and even light rain. Plenty warm sleeping on a wool blanket with proper covering. And the sight and sounds when you wake in the middle of the night in the forest... Plus an F-150 with a topper and screened windows, that we've converted with cozy comforters, mattresses and pillows into the deluxe camping version. There too, the sound of rain on the roof, and the view through the window and easy access out the tailgate and storage underneath ... I don't get why two people would need any more. Comfort, cheap, and again, the views...

4) An intro to BWCA (Boundary Waters Canoe Area). I dunno... portaging to prove something; the crowds that July and August brings, even with a 9-limit party rule; and the expense (including drive with gas what it is, and the need to secure extra vacation days off...) Glad I went to the presentation, but I don't see that vacation in my future this summer anyway.

5) A man named Crowley's 54-day journey "going round" Ireland clockwise from Dublin to Dublin. He was out for about 83 days, having to spend 10 days alone with one family who took him in and enjoyed his company at meals due to the poor summer weather in Ireland last summer. I'm not a sea kayaker, don't care for the long boats, so I'd never plan that one myself. But his pictures of Skellig Michael, and his stories about the hospitable people who made what could have been a bummer journey, even an aborted trip, end up a pleasure made the presentation well worth it.

6) Finally, the best presentation of the day, by "Lena" a Swede outdoorswoman who primarily runs trips off the coasts of Norway. Just hilarious, and beautiful pictures as well. I'm sure she'll see some bookings, as she takes plenty of older people/retirees -- no experience required -- and plenty are day trips, meaning you can return to shore and sleep in cottages after filling your belly with the finest native cuisine. Even runs an excursion to Dubrovnik, Croatia, where the food and the exchange rate are well worth it; and a winter dogsled excursion helping the reindeer/caribou along on their annual migration. Mostly though, it was the Norwegian jokes told by a Swede, and her competent trip planning skills that came through after she and her husband set up their own company after being guides for so many years...

The 2 presentatations that weren't up to muster:

1) A fellow who was sponsored by plenty -- even asked for donations of our own if we were so inspired -- who travelled around Lake Superior beginning in mid-September, tracked by schoolkids online daily. They "directed" his journeys (whether he should continue paddling or where to bring it in), and he posted via laptop and phone power every night. Beh.

I'm not much for having your travels paid for on the backs of "educational" sponsors for schoolkids, and sadly for so many, this seems to be the wave of the future. Watching, rather than doing. (Which is why I don't worry much about the huge numbers who attend such a convention -- if 1/3 get out on the water this summer, I'd be surprised) Lake Superior in autumn, as he found out, is much too late really. And the jokes about the woman who paddled with him (a girlfriend? who knows?) were just one too many for my non-schoolchild tastes.

Plus, camping on rock doesn't excite anyone, and having to paddle at night in the dark (as opposed to Lena's summer "Land of the Midnight Sun", say) because you've got to make up miles if you're going to complete your journey before November sets in ... what's fun about that?

2) The 4:30pm presentation I checked out, because there wasn't much offered at the time, and it could have been interesting in better hands, was called "Paddling with Children". In my dreams, I'd homeschool any of mine. Use the summers, the outdoors, and the collected textbooks and older non-fiction (it really was better written in the 50s and 60s!) to supplement the outdoor laboratory. Build their bodies, teach them maturity through doing, and have them with us -- not led by some educational major.

But this woman -- again sponsored by many outfitters and writing a book on how to involve children in the outdoors -- only gave common-sense basics: Expect trips to take longer, and be more spontaneous with a child along. Swim when it's warm, and stop and check things out along the way, if you're the destination-driven types who don't do that already. (We're not.) Bring along snacks, small journal books, and their own fishing pole to keep children occupied. A mounted umbrella in the canoe is nice for them in both light rain, and sun. Nothing you didn't already know, if you've been out paddling yourself.

Plus, even with a child along, I think you should respect the "Take only pictures" rules, and not pick up collectibles along the way. What are you teaching them by letting them take things they find? And what could have been a good question: how do you deal with diapers? became only the basic -- "pack it out, and double bag" advice. Here's one -- how about just day trips until junior is potty-trained at least, and why the heck would you take a toddler out in areas where you have to worry about bears at night anyway?

Mostly what I didn't like was this woman's maniacal laugh, and her using her child to "hold up" things like the memo pads or snack bags. Yeah we get it. Passing the microphone and having your child tell us what that was ... I'm not much for using your child to futher your own "career" as a parent-outdoorswoman expert. The whole presentation, she admitted, was poorly planned and badly presented. Too bad, as it could have been an interesting topic if she was organized and knew what she was doing.

Mal enjoyed himself yesterday, came home with a nice pair of pants. He paid a lot, but he'll get his use out of them, and unlike me, it's not as easy for him sizewise to find discards at the local thrift stores from people who have unused outdoor gear they paid a lot for, and later donated and put back on the shelves.

Sunny out there now; lots to catch up on this week (taxes, etc.) so posting will be light. Make it a great week, all! (Yes you can.)

Thursday, March 6

Let me just help some out a bit, those whose instincts are off, who seriously seem to be debating whether or not Barack Obama should consider adding Hillary Clinton to his ticket as Veep... you've missed the boat, friends.

The true question you should be asking -- even at this point in time, if you're capable of critically looking and thinking well ahead -- is will Barack Obama deign to humble himself early in his political career, (as if Vice President of the United States is a mere consolation prize!) to understand that if he is a true team player, it is he, not she, who should be mulling such an offer...
----------------
Here's a blog dissecting today's Sun-Times column by John Kass, the man who came after -- but in no way could replace -- the great Mike Royko.
----------------
Interesting 2003 interview of Walter Jacobson in the Windy City Times. Not a PC man, but honest. We need to go back to those times in this country, imo, if we've any hope of competing as a whole and winning. Enough with the good-looking nonsense that doesn't serve to put the best people in the jobs where they're needed to work and lead. This business of kowtowing to special interests, and protecting everybody's feelings from being offended is really killing us...

DG: You and Bill were No. 1 in the 10 p.m. ratings race. It would appear that the decline of Channel Two as the No. 1 watched 10 p.m. news broadcast began after you and Bill ceased being co-anchors of that show. Can you share any of the reasons why you and Kurtis did eventually part ways and why you both decided to leave?

WJ: I don’t remember exactly when CBS changed the team, I think over the years viewer demands changed. I mean, Bill and I were an all-white, male team at a time when we were all in this country beginning to understand that women ought to begin playing equal roles at the very least. And the management at that time in the late ‘70s and early ‘80s determined that we better include more women in our broadcasts. And that meant that one of us had to play a little bit lesser of a role.

Because Bill was the strong anchor personality, if we had to bring a woman on to the anchor team, I would be the one to step aside. Especially because I was also doing the commentary and CBS could have a male-female anchor team and still have “Perspective.” Why and exactly when the changes began, I’m not sure. There was a succession of general managers (at CBS) with different ideas and different things to prove and different ways to be successful, and so it was just kind of a natural evolution.
...
DG: Walter, it’s a known fact that there are many gay and lesbian individuals working in broadcast journalism, and in the media, period. How do you feel about the gay and lesbian journalists on your staff, and does it matter whether or not they are out at work?

WJ: Well if they’re not out I don’t know about their choice of lifestyle. If they are out, it makes to me not a wit of difference. I mean, how could I possibly judge a person’s competence to cover a news story by the lifestyle that he or she has chosen? I don’t even think about it. It’s not of any importance to me whatever. I want to work with people who know how to go out and get stories and present them as fairly and objectively as possible. And whether a person is gay or straight is totally irrelevant.
...
DG: Well, I think there are more reporters who are out as gay and lesbian ... I would venture that I do know of at least two or three anchors …

WJ: In Chicago? Well, then we know that if there are gay and/or lesbian anchors working on-air right now in Chicago then we know that being gay does not reduce the audience. The smart thing would be to come out, because you will be reaching the gay audience! We certainly learned that through business decisions by the advertisers that it wins you audience’s money rather than loses it. There is a huge gay/lesbian population out there that is loaded with money. And it is the not-very-bright general manager or newspaper publisher who ignores that. We certainly know that the politicians understand that.

Poor Andrew.

Here he was doing his victory dance and all... It's almost pitiful -- if you can't see the humour -- when a seemingly grown man lets his fears/past hatreds overwhelm any attempt at dignity or rational thinking.

His anti-Hillary crusade doesn't seem to be working amongst American Democrats, and all the poor fellow can think to do, apparently, is hit the Jagermeister bottle.

Ah, best give him a few points for trying...

This is the hunter's badge of glory:
That he protects and tends his quarry,
Hunts with honour, as is due,
And through the beast to God is true.


(Perhaps soon we'll be hearing exactly how relevant the preferences of voters in democratic stronghold of Wyoming really are. :-) Forgive the Englishman; he means well in his own mind, I suspect. And he admits Obama's personality has really wowed him, incapacitating any skeptical or strategic thought that may have existed in his once self-described "conservative intellectual" mind. But go easy on the hard liquor, eh friend?)

Wednesday, March 5

"I just answered, like, eight questions."

Back in the late 70s - early 80s, growing up in the Chicago region, we were a Walter (Jacobson) and Bill (Kurtis) family. Back when folks used to sit together and watch the news religiously every evening, it said something about which personalities you chose to spend time with your family. Distinct they were, not the interchangeable good-looking anchor faces of today.

My dad never missed Walter's "Perspective". Didn't always agree with his smarmy style, but like Royko, Walter had his finger on the pulse of Chicago and had no fear in exposing those whose practices set back honest working men and city taxpayers. Bill was okay too -- stable in the face of controversy and crisis, and a good partner for Walter in seeming to balance the team.

Bill left in the early 80s for a national anchor role, and then his documentary projects, and though he later came back to Chicago news, I had grown up and out of the family house and remember them mostly in the context of those earlier times. Walter eventually moved over to WFLD Fox News, which gave the brand some serious news credibility in Chicago.

There were other impressive news teams in Chicago too: while Bill and Walter were on CBS, Carol Marin and Ron Magers were on NBC. Though not our first choice, they too were a smart and classy team. Magers has a brother with a comfortable resemblance, I noticed when I lived in the Twin Cities market.

But this post isn't about Walter, Bill, or Ron, but Carol Marin. Her name came up in this exchange of recent days, and brought back the memories. She too served as a reporter in those days, before journalism changed and the looks and reading ability were deemed more important than your skills in asking a follow-up question and pursuing a story.

It seems Carol is still going strong, resigning from NBC -- followed by Ron soon after -- when her station made the decision to grant Jerry Springer personal news-analysis time, akin to Walter's Perspective segments. She's writing for the Sun-Times now, and it was kind of cute to hear her labeled as an "agitator" in this piece:

Tom Raum of the Associated Press led off with a question about whether an Obama aide had told Canadians not to take seriously the candidate's public rhetoric critical of the NAFTA trade agreement.

"Let me, let me, let me, let me just be absolutely clear what happened," Obama answered, explaining that the meeting was a "courtesy" and involved no "winks and nods."

Then an agitator -- columnist Carol Marin with the Chicago Sun-Times -- broke in. Marin, a visitor to the Obama entourage who accused the regulars of being too "quiet," accused the candidate of concealing details about fundraisers Rezko had for him and a real estate transaction between the two.

"I don't think it's fair to suggest somehow that we've been trying to hide the ball on this," Obama answered. But this only provoked a noisy back-and-forth between Marin, Sun-Times colleague Lynn Sweet and Michael Flannery from Chicago's CBS affiliate. "How many fundraisers? . . . Who was there? . . . Disclosure of the closing documents?"

Obama, while repeating his formulation that it was "a boneheaded move" to do business with Rezko, tried to shut down the requests for more information. "These requests, I think, could just go on forever," he said. "At some point, what we need to try to do is respond to what's pertinent."

Reporters, however, had a different idea of what was pertinent, and the questions about Rezko, NAFTA and other unpleasant subjects continued to come. An aide called out "last question," and Obama made his move for the exit -- only for reporters to shout after him in protest.

"C'mon, guys," he pleaded. "I just answered, like, eight questions."


It only seems fitting that we resurrect the glory days of Chicago newsgathering -- one last hurrah, so to speak -- in helping us figure out who's best to get into office now, and make some sense of what all the Bush/Cheney administration has been up to these past years. Because if you think what's out in the open now disgusts you, imagine what surprises we'll find when a fresh team gets in there. Politics ain't beanball, after all.

Have a great Wednesday, and let's end with these Prince lyrics today, shall we?

I know, I know, I know times are changin'...
We all reach out for somethin' new; that means you too.
You say you want a leader,
but you can't seem to make up your mind.
I think you better close it, and let me guide you...
through the purple rain.


Thanks Carol, for doing your job, and personally, for helping me to remember days gone by.

"I hope for the future. I remember the past. I live in the present."
-------------------------

Added: Worth checking out too Susan Estrich's column today. She can be considered a journalist, though one with significant legislative and legal knowledge on the Supreme Court and its precedents. Former editor of the Harvard Law Review even...
Blame the Supremes. That's right. The nine of them are responsible for this mess.

If you're shaking your head about how it is that in Texas, Democrats vote not once but twice, and lifelong Republicans who want to jimmy with the process can vote, too; or why it is that in California, independents (or, as we call them, "decline to states") could vote in the Democratic primary but not in the Republican primary — if they knew to fill in both the bubble for their candidate of choice and a separate one saying they were Democrats for the day; or how it came to be that even though Michigan and Florida held primaries on the date ordained by state law, the results don't count (at least as of now) for the Democrats, the short answer is simple: Blame the United States Supreme Court.
...
The issue in 1980 was the Wisconsin open primary. Wisconsin has, and had then, a long tradition of allowing anyone, regardless of party, to cast their vote in whichever primary they wanted. You didn't even have to become a Democrat for the day to do it. But after the 1972 contests — in which there were all kinds of reports of Wallace people voting for McGovern, and various and sundry Republican troublemakers trying to affect the choice of the man who would run against their nominee, President Richard Nixon — the Democrats adopted a rule limiting participation in the primaries and caucuses leading up to the nominating convention to "bona fide Democrats."

Wisconsin sought an exemption from the rule prohibiting so-called "open primaries," but the national party said no. Wisconsin held an open primary anyway. The national party made noise about not seating the Wisconsin delegation. It took until the very late spring of 1980 for the case to reach the point of a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held in the Democratic Party's favor.

The Court reasoned that even though the two parties (or any others for that matter) are nowhere mentioned in the Constitution, they enjoy First Amendment rights of freedom of association, which they were exercising in coming up with their rules governing delegate selection. The party's interest, the Court concluded, could not be infringed by any individual state, even if it was trying to effectuate a legitimate and reasonable goal of opening up participation in the process to as many of its residents as possible.

Since then, it has been established law that the parties decide how delegates get picked and nominations get decided, even if it is the states that technically do things like set the dates for primaries and caucuses. Where there's a conflict, the party wins. That's why no one from Florida or Michigan is buying tickets to the Denver convention. Yet.

The problem, of course, is that — as is also true with respect to the Court's decisions on campaign finance reform — the system erected by the Supreme Court makes more sense as a matter of constitutional theory than political reality. The parties aren't small-d democratic: They are collections of insiders, hacks and partisans, quadrennially dominated according to loyalty to the vying presidential candidates. Whether Michigan or Florida should have delegates, and how they should be selected, isn't an abstract question of political science, but a question of whether you're for Obama or Hillary. The primary-caucus system in Texas gives more power to insiders, not a greater voice to the people.

Why the Democratic and Republican Parties should have this kind of power is not a matter of whether it's right, but of the finality of the decisions of the Supreme Court — even when they're wrong. In 1980, the Democrats decided to seat Wisconsin anyway. Ever since, they've gotten an exemption. Oh, well.

Tuesday, March 4

And they went for it...

A-mazing. The publishing company, the reviewers, the reporters interviewing her... nobody even caught a whiff of bullshit before her sister clued them in? This lady "author" is at best naive, and most likely mentally ill. But those in the industry, to me, are the ones who should hang their heads, maybe take a job in the real world for a time:

Ms. Seltzer told The Times last week, “One of the first things I did once I started making drug money was to buy a burial plot.”
...
Ms. Seltzer’s story started unraveling last Thursday after she was profiled in the House & Home section of The New York Times. The article appeared alongside a photograph of Ms. Seltzer and her 8-year-old daughter, Rya. Ms. Seltzer’s older sister, Cyndi Hoffman, saw the article and called Riverhead to tell editors that Ms. Seltzer’s story was untrue.
...
In a telephone interview, Ms. Seltzer’s sister, Ms. Hoffman, 47, said: “It could have and should have been stopped before now.” Referring to the publisher, she added: “I don’t know how they do business, but I would think that protocol would have them doing fact-checking.”

Ms. Seltzer said she had met some gang members during a short stint she said she spent at “Grant” high school “in the Valley.” (A Google search identifies Ulysses S. Grant High School, a school on 34 acres in the Valley Glen neighborhood in the east-central San Fernando Valley.) “It opened my mind to the fact that not everybody is as they are portrayed on the news,” she said. “Everything’s not that black and white or gray or brown.”

Ms. Seltzer added that she wrote the book “sitting at the Starbucks” in South-Central, where “I would talk to kids who were Black Panthers and kids who were gang members and kids who were not.”

Monday, March 3

Maybe it's just me...

the part of the country where I live, or the pre-teen girls I('ve) know(n), but this story made me kinda sad.

I mean, is this really what passes for "normal" in that demographic today, or is it just the personal outlook of those currently in control of publishing and reviewing the books, and writing them -- apparently from the perspective of memory, and experience in raising two teenage ... boys?

No wonder some kids can't be bothered reading, especially fiction. I'd hate for young girls -- with so many opportunities opening to them nowadays, if they're willing to work hard and compete honestly -- to think this is really what it's all about:

The main character and narrator is Vanessa Rothrock, the daughter of Elyssa Rothrock, the governor of Florida - it is fiction, after all - who is running for president. In all other respects, Vanessa is a more or less normal about-to-be-teenage girl.

She sweats out spelling bees, she watches Gilmore Girls, she worries about the size of her butt, she prays to "the Boob Fairy" to do something miraculous with her chest.

And she worries. God, does she worry. About whether Reginald Trumball is really interested in her and, incidentally, how her mother is doing in the Iowa caucuses.

Puberty can be hell.


Still, maybe it'll sell well among those poor girls currently being raised in some areas of Florida. (Where it seems your jingle and looks are what you're valued for.) Kinda the "Are you there God?, it's me Margaret" specific subset of "girl readers". (Though I liked Judy Blume, somehow I think plenty of us never connected with that character, either.)*
"This voice speaks to me," says Gephart. "It comes out naturally. I can hear the dialogue for this age. Maybe I'm still 12 years old at heart. I would never say that writing a book is easy, but I can connect with that age group and character."

For someone who grew up in Philadelphia, and made the public library her second home - her favorite book as a child was Mr. Popper's Penguins - publishing a novel is a particularly rewarding turn of events.
...
After getting an education degree at Penn State and ignoring it, she freelanced in the writing trade: funny greeting cards by the hundreds, essays in Family Circle and Parents magazines, poetry and stories in Highlights for Children
...
The Young Adult market is a growth market - all hail J.K. Rowling and her immortal creation! - and Gephart has made words her vocation as well as her avocation. Her husband, Daniel, works with them as well, as an editorial director at LRP publications, a newsletter company. "We play Scrabble almost every night."

They moved here 11 years ago from Philadelphia, with their two boys, Jake and Andrew. Andrew is in the ninth grade at Dreyfoos School of the Arts. Ominously, he likes to write.

"I'll bet (he'll) have more respect for me now, eh?" Gephart says. "Writing a book is nothing compared to raising two teenaged boys."


-------------------
*Or maybe, though I'd be loathe to admit it, some aspects of Madison living have rubbed off on me. In a good way, this expectation of what our girls are really capable of and can accomplish, if we only lay off the "normal" stereotypes.

One of my law professors here -- I think this is what I honestly liked best about her -- raised two obviously bright young women, one of whom scored perfect on her SATs. Somehow I bet she didn't waste much time bringing such fiction into the home, searching out instead other more challenging and encouraging materials.

Saturday, March 1

Yeah, baby...

Live from New York, it is Saturday Night!

How 'bout that Hillary Clinton? It's like the little people's hate only makes her stronger...

And nice opening monologue by Ellen Page, as well. I hope some of those bloggy bloggers were listening in and learned a blog-danged thang or two!

Again, good to have the union writers back...

--------------

*In other news of the day, Eau Claire Memorial defeated Madison Edgewood on the ice. Which wraps up another high school hockey season. Better luck next year, Crusaders.

Mosinee co-op v. Fond du Lac/Waupun...

in the girls' championship game on t.v. right now.

I'm really disappointed in this website, this year.* They presumably brought on a blogger, Deb Scanlon, to cover the girls' play, but sadly, she has been really slow on the updating. To the point of there still being no coverage of yesterday's games telling us how the two teams advanced to the championships.

Also, though their team name is the Central Wisconsin Storm , the league refers to them as Mosinee co-op, so I think for consistency's sake, you ought to stick with the Mosinee name. (A co-op team is a collection of more than one school; present in the boys' game, as with Appleton co-op, but more common right now in girls' play as it's harder finding enough girls playing hockey within one school right now to field a team. Central Wisconsin Storm is made up of students from Mosinee/Wausau East/Wausau West/DC Everest.)

Speaking of, the Mosinee co-op "Storm" (the high school mascot is the Warriors, but again, this team represents more than one school) are up 3-0 on the Fond du Lac co-op team. The announcers credit that to each player "getting her job done" and collectively, them continuing to "move their feet."

(And just to give those Zamboni guys credit... "Nice Ice!")

Another name I heard that made me double-check my program here at home: there's a sophmore playing who has had at least one assist for Mosinee, who shares the surname of the boys' goalie I wrote about a few days back. Probably brother/sister (her a 10th grader, he in 9th), but could be cousins given some of the family roots in many Wisconsin towns.

So how about that? If indeed they are siblings, kudos to the parents for obviously raising two winners. I really like it when the girls in a family are encouraged to compete too, and not sit back and think they can't play because "hockey is a man's sport" or something like that. Only seems fair to me, and the cardio-vascular workout in skating hard can only pay off in years to come in terms of the youngster's health.

Speaking of, just so you don't think I'm some crabby old lady who doesn't understand boys will be boys -- those kids throwing paper, mentioned earlier, that I was ticked off at last night? A co-ed group -- boys and girls. Now I was seated there first; they came up and sat directly behind me during about the second period of the first game. (They were from Eau Claire, who played the next one.) So I could see the "flirting" aspects, and the possible boredom at paying attention to the earlier game being played.

But the truth is, when I first turned around after being hit and asked them to please either go sit with their parents if they weren't mature enough to be left alone, or to shape it up, it was the boys who seemed to listen and looked apologetic. It was the teen girls behind on either side of me, who thought that was their cue then to then dangle their legs, brushing up against my coat. So you see, I'm not a boy-hater at all. Just I think when an adult asks you nicely to knock it off/not disturb them, and points out their presence in case you initially missed that, that's plenty warning. Maybe it's psychology that the girls would then take such a request as a "challenge", and play the "We didn't kick you game!"

Anyway, the view is better on t.v. today anyway, and I wasn't planning on spending the extra $8 driving to the rink anyway...

* Additionally, they got the goalie numbers wrong in the Mosinee/Edgewood game I wrote about. Now I certainly understand innocent errors, but if you were watching the game -- or even looked it up in the program that has the numbers correct -- how could you report that one wrong? Remember, this site operates for pay (ads and contributions), so the standard naturally is a bit higher than mere freebie submitted stories.
----------------------

Update: And Mosinee co-op wins their first state title, 5-0. Their head coach -- Coach Dennis Drake -- is probably the father of the goalie, who shares the same surname.

A while back, I quit reading the Althouse blogspot. She was a former professor of mine, and while initially entertaining, I found her blog "work" to be more shoddy than to continue giving her the page hits.

But I do occasionally click on the InstaPundit, who of course gave Ann her big start, linking to the clever little posts she cooks up. Today, I read a link to Althouse's blog there "Why are the words 'NIG' on the child's pajamas?"

Again, as a professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School, I've got to ask: when will her sub-par thinking skills be checked?

Years back, she got another landslide of page hits for a controversy she admits cleverly manipulating: a young blogger named Jessica Valenti attended a luncheon with ex-president Clinton, and Ann fueled comments that the woman was "posing" by sticking her breasts out to remind everyone of Monica Lewinsky (think she's a big Obama supporter nowadays, btw?) Many defended Valenti, saying, "Look, she's wearing a bra, in a modest shirt, and turned her body slightly to the side as did others in the group photo, which is a common way to pose when you take a picture of several people in line."

Well Ann played and played and played that one, for all it was worth. She admitted she loved the numbers of outraged readers it brought her blog, in terms of quantity of clicks. Seems today she's at it again...

I won't link there, but here is a concise debunking of the myth she is again trying to spread. I saw the Clinton ad when I woke up this morning on the news; essentially, it shows sleeping children and makes the point, "If there's trouble in the world, a crisis in say the Middle East, do you really feel comfortable with a first-term senator in charge of the country, or would you feel better if there was a more experienced president in the White House taking that call in the middle of the night." The sleeping children, I think, meant to appeal to the security of our American children's future.

You could honestly criticize that approach, or even defend Obama in "taking the call" so to speak (although somehow I don't think him saying into the receiver, "But I would have voted against invading Iraq! Please leave us alone!" would carry much weight... :)

But in Ann's comments, somebody asks the question above, and Ann -- probably sensing a way to further her name and blog in the new news media business -- runs with it. "Why are the words 'NIG' on the child's pajamas?"

Again, she's seeing something that is not there, I think most rational people would agree. Watch the ad and see for yourself. This is not Huckabee's "floating cross". It's more like the time she psychoanalyzed a skit involving Bill and Hillary eating some onion rings and carrot sticks, I think it was, and determined that was a play on Bill's castration. (Don't quote me on the details, but I think that was the gist of what she saw, and insisted was there.)

I for one, as an intelligent adult, and especially a former UW student, find her stooping to racial antagonism in this one to be pitiful. I sat in her classroom -- there will be no apology, or admission of perhaps error coming, when people point out there's no "NIG" there -- that the writing on the pajamas merely says, "Good night", which one might argue is more in line with the ad's message. But racial baiting? By golly, that's LOW. And we've seen so much early "hands-off" on questioning whether the Obama campaign themselves were playing the race card, hiding behind honest criticism by implying that Bill Clinton after the S.C. election and others were trying to pigeonhole Obama as the black candidate. I've said it before, I'll say it again: were it not for his color, much of the "inspiration" would be sucked out of his speeches, and were he merely Barry O'Brien, first-term senator from the cauldron that is Illinois politics, darned tootin he'd be scrutinized more carefully for his personal connections with Tony Rezko, if his campaign was not ignored altogether.

So having it both ways... no. Sorry. And Ann, why not stay in Brooklyn and don't deign to come back to old Wisconsin if this is the intellectual honesty you display on your blog. We really don't need that type of race-baiting here, seeing things that aren't there, and subtly accusing others of being racists. If you want to criticize the ad, do so honestly. Don't stir the pot just because it might bring you personal gain. Or if you do want to play that way, please toss off the intellectual scholar label that ties you into UW Law School, at least.

People really have worked hard to build a brand there, and your silliness in pursuit of your own dishonest ends can destroy it quickly.
-----------------

In other Obama news, here's a Susan Estrich column "Friendship in the Fourth Estate" you might find worth reading.

A funny thing is about to happen to Barack Obama. No matter how much he thinks he's ready for it, he isn't. No matter how many people warn him, he'll be surprised. And hurt. And angry.

His friends in the press are about to turn on him.

They may not even know it yet, but they will.

They can't help themselves. They've been caught fawning, made fun of for favoritism, become the subject of their own scrutiny.

Which means they won't be able to resist.
...
It's the press's nature to turn on those they most adore. The bigger the buildup, the bigger the letdown. Watch the balloon fill with air. Watch them start pricking holes. Watch the balloon lose air. Wait to see if there's still a balloon at all in the end.

Mark my words. It's about to begin.

This is not, as conservatives like to believe, an ideological thing. The press may be liberal, in the sense that most of them vote that way and are almost certainly voting for Obama. But they are simultaneously drawn to and repulsed by their own desire for attention, their own importance, their role as makers, cheerleaders and faithless friends.

The press had plenty of reason to feel burnt by the Clintons, having fallen for him once, big time, only to find themselves, in their book, manipulated and misled.
That is not, I should add, how the Clintons saw it. They saw it as the press turning on them, which was also true. That is no doubt how Barack Obama will also see it, and he will, to a certain extent, be right.

Here it comes: Is Barack pro-Israel enough? Is he tough enough? Is he substantive enough? What about his past? What about those votes in the Illinois Senate? What exactly has he accomplished?

And, most important of all, has he been getting a free ride?

It's not that these questions shouldn't be asked. They should. But they should be asked throughout the process, not, as is about to happen, in an avalanche, a storm of scrutiny, a blizzard of second-guessing from the very gushers who were, only a few short weeks ago, so busy guzzling Kool-Aid that they didn't even look to see what it was made of.

Saturday in the park...

Actually, it was Friday in the park. The Vilas zoo here in Madison, which I understand to be the only free zoo in the nation. We had Mal's 7+1/2 year old nephew with us, and as I found last year, the zoo really is more enjoyable in winter than summer. Less people crowded up at the exhibits, and although some animals are inside, plenty are still out.

The polar bears, the lion and lioness, the bison, the seals, the bird house and reptile den... It was a fun morning. Then we went to the Veterans Museum on the end of State Street, which also has some fabulous exhibits if you haven't been to that one yet. This boy, who shares the name of the county he was visiting, was smart and fun to be around. He asked some good questions of the zookeeper who was hosing ice off the steps of the polar bears' exhibit -- the male Nanook came from the wild, when a hunter in the 70s was forced to shoot his mother in self defense. The cub and his brother were brought to Vilas, and then the brother later transferred to another zoo and a female born in captivity brought in for companionship.

"Does he get to visit his brother?" he asked, exhibiting the same emotional sense I did as a child, learning about slavery and finding the selling off of families to be the hardest thing of all to accept. Splitting the family up -- it just seems to be the most painful thing of all, especially through a child's eyes.

The zookeeper answered honestly, "Oh, when they were adults, they used to fight all the time, and it was best to separate them. So no, we don't get them together anymore." She also explained to the adults present, that the female generally stays out of the male's way, although they have mated in the past, with her on birth control as they don't have the capacity to handle any cubs' birth in their facility.

Zoos nowadays have contained breeding progams, meaning Nanook is rare in that he came directly from the wild, and his stock is prized for that reason. She expected he eventually would be transferred too, and studded out for those genes. She also explained how their fur is really clear, not white, and thus why the two appeared to be different colors. (He is a swimmer, and was wet taking on the yellowish appearance, apparently more green in summer from the algae, while the female was white and fluffy looking, preferring to stay dry yesterday.)

So all in all, an interesting trip and a good day to be outside breathing some cold but fresh air.

On to yesterday evening's games...
It's a good thing Mal and I aren't bettors, I guess. Madison Edgewood looked impressive in their victory -- they've got one or two kids who can really skate -- and they beat Appleton 3 - 2. So so much for Appleton taking the title their first trip to the state tournament....

In the best play of the night, Superior and Eau Claire Memorial went back and forth with Memorial eventually dominating in the third with a few clinkers off the pipes, (update: I guess one went in the minute or two before play ended, as I headed out to the parking lot to beat the crowds. Maybe an empty netter if Superior pulled their goalie? Confirmed. The final was 4-2.) and holding the 3-2 advantage they took into the period. Excellent hockey. Great skating, great defense, the hustle and energy on that ice... amazing. They say Eau Claire will dominate Edgewood today -- it really is a different brand of hockey played in the northern parts of the state, but me? I'm pulling for Edgewood. Why? The Eau Claire fans who sat around me were just the most obnoxious I have seen (parents: if you don't want to be around your children, and they aren't old enough to act mature in public, for heaven's sake rotate an adult in and out to sit with them. Because when I got hit with a wadded up piece of paper from the "throwing things at each other game" going on in the rows behind me, I'm the type of adult who will turn around and say something to them. And walking on the seats, where people are going to sit, with your dirty shoes/boots?; why not just teach them how to act in public?

I understand $8 is $8, and when bigger teams play, the building makes lot of money. But some people are there to watch the game on the ice, and not play around in the stands. And I guarantee you, your kids will only turn out better if you teach them to respect adults, and not do dumb things like dangle their shoes over the seat adjacent to an adult, essentially brushing up against her jacket sleeves.

So though I went there neutral, I just don't like to see undisciplined kids, and partisan adults who boo the refs when you don't like the call. (And though I maybe could understand such verbal actions at a non-high school competition, it's sad to see the message being sent when the honest truth is: those referees were just calling an honest, alert game.) And I don't even consider myself a candidate for the Jane Sportsmanship award either, but at that level, some things really are common sense.

Let's just hope, somehow, (a miraculous twist perhaps?) Eau Claire Memorial sees their undefeated season record punctured today. For the good of some of their fat, wealthy fans who surely will have the biggest heads this off-season if they win it all. Really, that's not good for the victors if they never learned how to be good winners, capable of perspective and respect to others. Arrogance can kill, and it's generally self-imposed destruction imo.

But enough about the hockey. Here's another Shaggy tune you might like (these ones really are better when you hear the music alongside the lyrics). It starts out:

I remember, wasn't so long ago
We had a one room shack and the livin' was low
And my mama by herself raised me and my bro
Wasn't easy but she did it with the little that flowed
Worked hard got us off to school everyday
And kept her eyes on the stars when the skies were gray
Gave us pride to survive, really showed us the way
Now I really understood what she was tryin' to say
She said, "Son there I'll be times when the tides are high
And the boat may be rocking, you can cry
Just never give up
And you can never give up," uh-uh
In this life you can lead if you only believe
And in order to achieve what you need
You can never give up
You can never give up
And this hope
That keeps me holding on
On and on
And this hope
That makes me carry on
On and on...
Boom-boom, couldn't have made it alone
I got a wonderful life, two kids of my own
With a strong foundation that was carved in stone
And my mama for the love that made my house a home
Made me wonder some time if this was meant to be
All this for a humble little guy like me
And all I ever really wanted was a family
To teach my kids the same value that she gave to me
She said, Son there'll be times when the tides are high
And the boat may be rocking, you can cry
Just never give up
You can never give up uh-uh
In this life you can lead if you only believe
And in order to achieve what you need
You can never give up
You can never give up And this hope
That keeps me holding on
And on
And this hope
That makes me carry on
On and on ...