Wednesday, February 25

How bout that Bobby Jindal?

... and the father himself paid on the installment plan -- fully -- for the cost of his son's birth. Amazing, such integrity. Where have you gone, Mr. Jindal?

I think the one point, of many, I would like to focus on:
The attention paid to the high school dropouts. "We need you." As if we haven't spent and publicized at all on that issue over the past decades. Either people take pride and buy in, or not, I figure...

Working as a library evening/weekend manager while I made my way through law school, let me please share this. The foreign students -- Indonesian, Indian, other Asians -- who applied for our work-study jobs at the circulation desk were disciplined, sober (that seems to be the word of the moment), and judging by the textbooks they studied from between helping patrons, SMART! They surely didn't need their president telling the parents "turn off the tv and read the child a book". Nor did they need encouragement to stay in high school, reach for the stars, heck, EARN that GED!

Until we face reality, and start paying some attention to the other end of our educational spectrum -- the needed hard maths and sciences even earlier in primary and junior high schools -- the further and further America falls behind. Make-work jobs, paid for by the government, simply won't pay off in the future.

We need to stimulate the private sector; instead of penalizing people for providing for their own children by forcing them to pay via taxes to subsidize others, we need to reward their choices and sacrifices by performing so well.

I too, Mr. Obama, get it. I worked my way up. My father paid for my insurance premiums until I could work, and cover them myself. Where is the incentive to wait to have your children, if we unwittingly via our tax code encourage people on the junior end of the economic spectrum to breed, rather than educate and work their way into a position where they can -- independently -- take care of their own?

Everyone who is honest knows that it's much easier to spend and create government goodies, than it is to scale back once the hardest times are over. See Social Security, which was intended to be a temporary government program afterall.

The immigrants get it. The developing countries are hungry too. Sometimes a little hunger, drive and pride can get you places. Worked for me!

More Bobby Jindal please. Because his speech hit one strong note, no? Do you really want the federal government that bailed out Louisiana responsible for bailing out the economy now? Or would you rather the private market set the rewards, order the priorities, and have people adapt their own behaviors -- including sobriety and sacrifice, and waiting until you can pay for your desires -- to the cold realities of life? Because that, my friends, is what made America great. And the opposite -- well, you tell me if the European Union is a world leader in either this century, or the twilight years of the past?

ADDED: And when did it become the American way to judge on style over substance? I mean, that's fine for the make-believe world of Hollywood films, but as things get worse and more and more people feel the pinch, something tells me we'll elect the smartest person for the position -- with a proven track record. If Jindal is credible on the governmnet ethics reforms in his state, and can indeed pull up Louisiana's poor educational reputatation, well that, combined with at least a term of executive experience, will put him head and shoulders above the current man sitting in the White House. Words are fine and good and all, but the actions behind them -- the results -- count for something out here in the real world too.

Too bad the press never really looked closely at a first-term senator's results of Change in his own home state. The corruption there is the same as it was when it was only white people pulling the levers and running the machine, distributing the plum patronage jobs and lucrative government contracts. Not I'm not saying Obama is responsible for all that -- it was of course going on while he was still back on the Hawaiian beaches, partying it up in high school. But where are the results of his much touted "community organizing"? Where are the improvements in the Chicago educational system, from his time spent working there?

If we're just looking for a president to make promises, hope and encourage us (like some people apparently never got at home from their family where these tasks are best undertaken) ... and nevermind the results, well surely even Barack Obama could be bested in that performance.

I mean, can we at least hold off on the standing ovations until the job is done? Or at least undertaken -- in a real sense, not just talky talk, hopes and promises for a better tomorrow ... tomorrow. Independence and self reliance will one day make a comeback -- maybe some of the most unstylish people in the world even will show us how. Hopefully we'll pick up on their tips, before they've completely eaten our lunches. 'Nuff said.




Make it a great Tuesday, folks!

Monday, February 16

Vagus nerve.

File under: learn something new every day.

(Remind me to tell you the story some time...)

Saturday, February 14

And please remember people, that no matter who you are, and what you do to live, thrive and survive, there are still some things that make us all the same: you, me them, everybody, everybody.

Everybody needs somebody
Everybody needs somebody to love (someone to love)
Sweetheart to miss (sweetheart to miss)
Sugar to kiss (sugar to kiss)

Happy Valentine's Day then. We now return to our regular programming...
___________


So go make it a great Saturday/weekend already!

ADDED: Siamo sempre noi Martina e Asia in un balletto tratto dal film dei Blues Brothers.

Thursday, February 12

God bless America.

Here's a feel-good human story if you need a lift out there. Never underestimate the power of human love.

SONG LYRIC (T minus 3):
You're much too young. Your life ain't begun.
Let's walk for awhile...

Tuesday, February 10

RIP Jeremy Lusk.

Risking big can be beautiful...
and sometimes it can kill you.

If you go in understanding that, and make your choices accordingly, you can turn in some beautiful work before your number's up. Nobody wants to die, but some surely want to live differently, more fully.

I'd say Mr. Lusk surely accomplished that in his brief life. Check out the beautiful tribute at the link.

Propping up RV jobs...

So if a town like Elkhardt, Ind. is built around an industry -- say "the RV capital of the world" -- and people decide they just don't want to buy big recreational vehicles, what with the price of gas being what it is, and so many modern families eschewing campgrounds for all-inclusive waterpark hotels ... why pump money into artificially propping up those businesses?

Shouldn't the town tough it out, and adapt to market preferences?

I ask this as somebody who remembers the death of the steel mill days, in northwest Indiana and south Chicago. In the late 70s, the steel market evaporated. You had high unemployment in the mills, and in factory jobs. Lots of suicides too, and belt tightening. Plenty of families picked up and moved south, following the job belt.

Cmon people -- America has seen rough times before, and high unemployment in plenty of specialized industries. It was tough -- but nobody suggested artificially inflating the market to keep people working in "make-work" jobs.

There's a difference between spending and investment. Namely, the latter presupposes that the spending eventually will pay off -- it's going for something that will help to make money in the future. How weatherizing homes, and government business, will help create jobs for decades into the future, is beyond me. Healthcare jobs ... that's where the future is.

I'm saddened here, because it seems like President Obama's big "action" plan really is only shifting the burden from the Baby Boom generation of entitlements to our future children and grandchildren. That's just spending money you don't have now, and expecting somebody else to pay the bill.

Frankly, I'd rather we all gut it out, and provide social services to the most needy. Because if this big action plan fails, or ultimately doesn't produce as a solid investment, can you imagine the needy that we will see tomorrow -- as our population ages, and the money necessary to sustain the social programs we know now that keeps the elderly from starving in the streets, is gone -- pooft, tomorrow's budget decisions and priorities already co-opted by the big action plan of 2009?

Thanks, but no thanks.
----------------------------
ADDED SONG LYRIC:
"I got it all down to a "t"
and it's ... free!"

Monday, February 9

I was working as a waitress in a cocktail bar...
That much is true.

Sunday, February 8

Just remember in the winter
far beneath the bitter snow...

Thursday, February 5

Come and get your love.

Well here we go. The annual Valentine's song countdown on Subsumed. I give the lyrics; you get the song.

I've been out of the office a bit this week; is tomorrow Friday already? Yee-haw.
--------------

"I do and do for you kids..."
And here's the Redbone version on YouTube.

Everybody now...

Tuesday, February 3

My Pet Goat, anyone?

Is this a joke?

http://apnews.myway.com/image/20090203/Obama.sff_DCPM114_20090203153925.html?date=20090203&docid=D964BKD01

Somebody actually thought it was a good idea to send the president off -- not even a month into office -- to read at storyhour to second-graders? You're kidding me.

This isn't a group of kids touring the White House, that you briefly go out and greet. During your last months in office. Maybe pull out a book and read them a story -- a memory they won't forget.

That photo calls back all the September 11 uh-oh moments, and if there's something I would think President Obama would be working on right now, it's boosting the confidence Americans have of him in office. Shedding the lightweight impression he naturally give off.

Can the publicity appearances right now, folks. Send the First Lady out there alone -- she'll do fine. It's too soon to start courting second-graders as potential voters, the aw-shucks parents votes probably come easier in economic good times, so pulling out an old playbook from the Clinton years probably won't help.

If there's anything you'd hope our Democratic Party would have learned by now, it's that throwing money at problems doesn't always work. And style points only get you so far. This is real, so let's put the childish things away for awhile?

Monday, February 2

"Nobody's perfect"... but then they're not all Cabinet members either.

WASHINGTON – Fighting to salvage his Cabinet nomination, Tom Daschle apologized Monday for failing to pay more than $120,000 in taxes and appealed to former Senate colleagues to approve him all the same. President Barack Obama said he was "absolutely" sticking with his nominee for health secretary, and a key senator added an important endorsement.

The White House both underscored the magnitude of the problem and tried to downplay it in the space of seven words. "Nobody's perfect," said press secretary Robert Gibbs. "It was a serious mistake. ..."
...
"We still think he's the best person to do health care reform and shepherd a very complicated process through Congress to achieve savings and cut costs for the American people," Gibbs said. The White House also had suggested Geithner was indispensable for the national economic revival in arguing for his confirmation despite tax problems.

Melanie Sloan, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, noted the Geithner nomination in saying she suspected tax problems would not prevent Daschle from becoming the next health secretary.

"If the guy who is overseeing the IRS can get away with a tax problem, how are you going to hold up the health and human services secretary over taxes?" she asked.


Well, I haven't done my taxes yet this year, but I am heartened that creative thinking apparently is rewarded under this new administation. (Too bad -- no kids to send off to sleepaway camp to take the childcare deduction, but using that kind of thinking...)

After Geithner squeaked through -- like this "economic recovery, deficit spending" bill which is garnering precious little critical press coverage either -- you'd think they'd be smart enough to say "Enough". (Because really, how much "change" do you suppose is going to come from corporate America frightened by strong words from ... Tim Geithner?*)

If a third tax cheat is put up at this point for a nomination, well, it's going to start to look like a pattern. Perhaps one that all American taxpayers might begin to follow (meaning, Sure I'll pay up ... once you catch me!).
---------------------
*Something about trying to enforce tax laws with unclean hands of your own...