Pat-a-cake, pat-a-cake, baker's man...

Bake me a cake: as fast as you can!
Roll it, and roll it, and mark it with a  B  V!
Pop it in the oven for baby and me!

The decision, handed down today, held that a Colorado bakery can be liable under Colorado anti-discrimination law for refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding, when it bakes similar cakes for traditional weddings.

The court rejected the bakery’s free speech and religious freedom arguments...

Oh hell,
there's no difference really between a gay wedding cake and a straight wedding cake...

#Let.Them.ALL.Eat.Cake. !
------------------------

Sound Legal Reasoning:

We recognize that section 24-34-601(2)(a) of CADA prohibits Masterpiece from displaying or disseminating a notice stating that it will refuse to provide its services based on a customer’s desire to engage in same-sex marriage or indicating that those engaging in same-sex marriage are unwelcome at the bakery. However, CADA does not prevent Masterpiece from posting a disclaimer in the store or on the Internet indicating that the provision of its services does not constitute an endorsement or approval of conduct protected by CADA. Masterpiece could also post or otherwise disseminate a message indicating that CADA requires it not to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and other protected characteristics. Such a message would likely have the effect of disassociating Masterpiece from its customers’ conduct.