Thursday, September 15

"I'm not a lawyer, but I play one at school..."

That ninny law professor who contacted me earlier in the year via my personal email address and threatened my blog (sure is a nice blog you got there; sad if anything happened to it), who concluded back in March, "Again, I am not going to communicate with you again. Consider yourself warned." -- is back at it again.

What part of "Do not email me" does she not understand? If one chooses to have a publicly assessible blog, with moderated comments up, is that an invitation to respond to commenters, and threaten or "warn" them, via private email? I think not. Respect boundaries, even law professors who just play at practicing law.

Professor Nina Camic: do not contact me via email. I'd hate to have to change my address because of the continuing threats to me, or my blog.

If I'm not emailing you, but you still emailed me before to warn, "I am not going to communicate with you again." then why the heck AGAIN email me? I don't get it... Is this a professorial-entitlement thing? Is she jealous of her colleague, and wants to cry "harrassment" on her own? Things a little slow in the drama department at home?

Either way, you think she'd understand she should not be emailing former students, or anyone who has not emailed her first, to make "threats" like that. Surely they have better things to concentrate on at the Wisconsin law school, now that they are being sued because of their potentially illegal affirmative action schemes that keep (former) professor's wives, and children now, well ensconced in law professor roles. (Of all the law schools in the world for qualified job applicants, ironic coincidence how the wife and child ended up at Wisconsin, eh?)

Gee, do you think she'll sue me for mentioning that? Implying, imho, that if her first hubby hadn't been on staff there himself at the time of her hire (before he divorced her), it's doubtful she would have been hired in the first place?

Especially with that questionable immigration status, she's referred to herself in the past...

(Maybe she should study up on her First Amendment protections, before making any more threats or false accusations...)