Thursday, February 16

The Life You Save...

RIP Anthony Shadid.

UW Journalism Grad Dead at 43 --
allegedly of asthma attack in Syria.

He leaves behind a wife, and two small children at home.

Sad thing is, he probably had an all inclusive health insurance package with the NYT. Didn't translate to good health, or long life though. Maybe his children will fare better...

Shadid's father, Buddy Shadid, told The Associated Press on Thursday his son had asthma all his life and had medication with him.

"(But) he was walking to the border because it was too dangerous to ride in the car," the father said. "He was walking behind some horses — he's more allergic to those than anything else — and he had an asthma attack."
...
Shadid, a 43-year-old American of Lebanese descent, had a wife, Nada Bakri, and a son and a daughter.
...
"At the end of the day, he's my husband, and the thought of going through life without him and raising our children alone is terrible," she said afterward.

Shadid's father, who lives in Oklahoma City, said a colleague tried to revive his son after he was stricken Thursday but couldn't.

"They were in an isolated place. There was no doctor around," Buddy Shadid said. "It took a couple of hours to get him to a hospital in Turkey."

Maybe they ought to reconsider sending parents of young children, especially those in dicey health, into "combat" situations.* No, seriously.

You know, like they do with women in the U.S. military.

Nothing personal, just protecting society's most vulnerable.

Because truth be told? I bet in years to come, the Pulitzer Prize will be cold comfort to two children needlessly growing up without a father.

War is hell, all right, and sometimes, real people pay a price...

Multiply his loss times 100,000, and perhaps you'll begin to get an idea of what America's "wargames" of the past 10 years have cost children and families in the Middle East region...

Violent transformation, and not even for the better necessarily. That's the new American way. *chest beating*

and hey, have you heard the one about the Mormon guy vacationing with his doggie atop the car? ("Stop me if you've heard this one already, Tony..." heh heh.)


---------------------------

* Isn't it time young Sulzberger venture abroad to cover a grand war or two? No kids yet for the initialed junior, right? I hear Israel is cooking up a grand recipe for disaster -- time to step up and fill some shoes, son?

Speaking of,
the 31-year-old Joseph Kennedy III is ready to step up to to taxpayer troughs to publicly serve himself. No word yet if the media will artificially pump this new candidate based on those ... sexxy bloodlines.

Monday, February 13

Having spent enough of my free time on pool decks...

let me say, I LOVE this video.

Not so much for the obvious joy of the young couple, or even that very sexxy swimmer's back ... but watch the sheer smiles, body language, and joy of surprise also obvious by the boy in the black trunks at the back, in the yellow TOPS cap.

Marrying ... just the thought of it, makes people beam.

"Love is ... a Contact Sport."

"Where do broken hearts go?
Can they find their way home?
Back to the open arms...
Of a Love that's waiting there...
And if somebody loves you,
Won't they always love you
?..."

RIP Whitney.
His Love is the Greatest Love of All.
(For this artist, it's a homecoming surely.)

"Hun, my life is over..."

"But yours has just begun..."

Saturday, February 11

Hope for Change.

The Man Who Should Be President.

Zero.

Degrees.
The car started, loudly,
and warmed up nicely.
About 220,000+ miles now.
When you take care of something,
and properly maintain and treat it good,
you can avoid an awful lot of problems
down the road. Preventative maintenance.
Then, you don't have to worry about the costs of the "fix". Not your concern. Simple helps -- windows that roll down, not electric. An easily assessible engine...

In the end, what we drive in life -- and how hard we drive it,
has costs. Choose wisely. Drive safe. Don't let your poor choices affect others.

Rules for the Road.

"You, who are on the road,
Must have a code,
that you can live by
..."

Friday, February 10

TimesTalk.

Obama compromises
on birth control,
and more.



Those of you still loyally in this man's corner, don't you ever think you'll be included in the "and more"?

Your day will come, trust me.

He's in it solely for himself.
And will bail out, and buy out,
and outpromise anyone else in the race.

Eyes on the Prize, eh?

News of the Week.

The week, not the weak.

(That's the post at 2:46 below...)

Warriors Downed.

Last night, I drove down to Eau Claire to watch Rice Lake take on the Old Abes. (Eau Claire is one of those "big" Wisconsin cities with more than one high school, like Madison. Eau Claire Memorial is strong in their hockey program.)

The Warriors were shut out, but kept it scoreless in the first period. But you get scored on, and then deflated, penalized for your play, they score and then pick up another one quickly, and in a game like hockey, things can quickly sour...

Rice Lake would have to get past the Old Abes -- at home -- to make it to the state playoffs in Madison this year.

But even before that, they have to beat Chippewa Falls...
-------------
In other news, our short burst of springtime is over and the typical winter temps have returned. 11 degrees coming into work today, and the sun is buffered by a layer of grey white.

OK, here's one for Friday then:

Don't your feet get cold in the wintertime?
The sky won't snow and the sun won't shine.
It's hard to tell the nighttime from the day...

Make it a great weekend, out there!

Thursday, February 9

Colder, but Sunnier.

My volunteer driving job (it pays mileage)
had me picking up Henrietta in Minong
for her appointment in Hayward on Wednesday.
(They are still recruiting drivers for the north counties.)

It was sunny, and warm, in the car.
She was ready when I was back
from picking up her prescription at Walgreens,
and we had a warm drive home, on 77 to Minong, too...
------------------
I stopped in Trego -- actually, Earl,
at the boat landing, and listened to the ice
breaking off in chunks in the sun into the Namekagon.
Patches of grass showing, which Buddy enjoyed smelling,
-- he's cautious on the ice-- (and was good on Henrietta's lap too).

In short, it was a wonderful Wednesday.
And the paper this week doesn't look half-bad too....

Monday, February 6

Decent productivity.

And counting!

Make it a great week,
whatever comes your way ...

Sunday, February 5

"Just Two Good Ole Boys...

Never Meaning No Harm..."

Read the whole thing?

Friday, February 3

If the Economy is Getting Better...

I think I'm starting to figure out the plan. If one day, you promise to work hard to help the "very poor", and the next day you realize that further padding the social safety net is an expensive job, why not just ... disappear the problem all together?

You know -- Happy Days are Here Again... gonna sing a song of cheer again... But still, inquiring minds want to know:

If the economy is getting better, then why did new home sales in the United States hit a brand new all-time record low during 2011?

If the economy is getting better, then why are there 6 million less jobs in America today than there were before the recession started?

If the economy is getting better, then why is the average duration of unemployment in this country close to an all-time record high?

If the economy is getting better, then why has the number of homeless female veterans more than doubled?

If the economy is getting better, then why has the number of Americans on food stamps increased by 3 million since this time last year and by more than 14 million since Barack Obama entered the White House?

If the economy is getting better, then why has the number of children living in poverty in America risen for four years in a row?

If the economy is getting better, then why is the percentage of Americans living in “extreme poverty” at an all-time high?

Something just isn't adding up here... Must be that "new math" they're teaching in the schools nowadays, eh?

Lest We Forget.

"About 24 million Americans, or 15 percent of the population, are unemployed, under-employed or have dropped out of the labor force."

ADDED:
Here's a pretty good comment on that thread.

Personally, I'd trust a working American with eyes open telling us what's still wrong, over a partisan part-time American economist any day*:

Dave • Kansas City, Missouri • 5 hrs ago
I can tell you a major reason why the economy is stagnant and slow to recover. Im a trucker and the cost of fuel has been taking up half my settlement. About 5 years back they increased the cost of diesel fuel to the point it cost more now than does unleaded gasoline. Not only does this effect trucking across the nation but it cost the consumer as well as these cost are passed along. Believe me when I say just about everything you buy from lumber, clothes, cars, food, etc.,etc., comes to you by truck and the cost has gone up due to the fuel prices.. Im to the point of selling my truck and getting out of this industry. The energy and oil companies are putting their teeth into the global economy with their greed, thats something that has to change. We've made things better in Iraq but has that shown up at the pump?? NO it hasn't!! In fact it has grown steadily worse. I have never understood the reasoning behind why the diesel fuel cost going up to more than gasoline when it is a by product of gasoline,, doesnt make sense.. Things will never go back to being what they once were unless diesel cost come down, we the people should be demanding this!!

* Especially one who used to work for Enron, and makes his trade in puffing numbers for political purposes. Say Mr. Krugman, what's the price of jet fuel these days, assuming your booking those tickets yourself and paying your fair share for your travel needs?

"Here I am, Lord."


"Is it I, Lord?
I have heard you calling in the night
..."

Honestly? The best thing we could do for the Obamas, I truly believe, is to get them the heck out of Washington and let them figure out a way to work their charitable impulses in the private sector, with no government funding needed.

Something's unhealthy in that family: Michelle and the girls don't seem too happy* being trotted out as props; despite today's "good news!" on the economic front, he's not finding satisfaction in his own work or job performance, I'm sure; and with his newfound committment to Christianity, surely he's not strong enough to stand up to Israel and his foreign-policy advisers like He-man Hil to actually practice Christian doctrine.

And G-d help us all if the Iranians make good on their "Do unto others" threat here to avenge the killings of the Iranian scientists. I don't care if it is just Jews in America being targeted and potentially killed -- the payback will come. I suspect Obama would be safer, and the country too, if he's well out of office before the heat really gets turned up...

--------------

* Look at her face there.
She knows him. She's not a poseur so much, or it doesn't come as naturally to her, given her upbringing compared to his. He's not a saint, and he's not even interpreting Jesus' message properly. Had he at least kept in touch with that Chicago reverend, he'd of had somebody in Washington to consult first. But now?

He's grabbing at Scripture, like the economists are busy spinning the numbers, to make it say what they think they need at this point in time. Short-term strategis like that rarely work.

Are we paying for this?*

I really love to know if these people were getting government taxpayer help:

The boy and four of his siblings were placed in the custody of Lee, a maternal uncle who was ordered by the judge not to allow the boy’s parents any contact with him. Lee also agreed to adopt the children if their parents are unable to regain custody. The boy also has an 18-year-old sister who is pregnant.

On Monday afternoon, Lederman, a veteran child-welfare judge with a history of overseeing some of South Florida’s most notorious child-abuse cases, demanded answers.

“He looks like he just came out of Auschwitz,” Lederman said. “This is like a neon sign for child abuse. It would have been obvious to anyone who came in contact with this family the last few years.”

Among those who came in contact: a child-abuse investigator from the Department of Children & Families, a mental health counselor from Jackson Memorial Hospital and educators from the 9-year-old’s school — who called the state’s child abuse hotline recently seeking help for the boy.

Lederman set a hearing for next month to hear from all those people. “It appears to me that there has been gross negligence here,” she said.

------------

*One way or another, we sure are...

Hmmm...

I'm no prizewinning globetrotting economist or anything (count my blessings!), but this little tidbit perked my ears:

Steven Leslie, lead analyst for financial services at the Economist Intelligence Unit, said every January the economy loses a significant number of jobs, often because stores and shippers lay off the extra hands brought on for the holidays.

The seasonal adjustments by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) attempt to strip out this effect. But because the behavior of employers and employees varies over time, adjustments based on patterns in the past may no longer be correct, Leslie said. Moreover, the BLS have this time made additional adjustment for recently received population estimates based on the 2010 census figures.

Hmmm. If we had a trusted neutral go-to source, we might be able to honestly assess what that impact means on the real numbers.

As it is, Krugs, Klein and the boys are busy popping the corks, pushing the numbers, and encouraging the "Vote Dem" meme.

ADDED: I keep forgetting: is Dave Weigel still getting the journolist meme memos, or is he back playing at being an honest conservative again?
daveweigel
New Black Panthers at job centers, obvs RT @AdamSerwer: So no one has any idea how black unemployment went down so fast last month.

Economist ... or political pundit.

Today, Krugman shows his hand:

The jobs report was definitely the best news we’ve had in a while.

The usual caveats apply: it could be a blip, it might be an artifact of seasonal adjustment, etc.. Also, the gap remains huge. Suppose that we need 100,000 jobs a month to keep up with population growth, and that we’re 10 million jobs in the hole — both conservative estimates. Then we need about 7 years of growth at this rate to restore full employment.
...
Still, genuinely good news. And I’m surprised that there wasn’t more action on Intrade; I’d say that Obama’s chances are looking significantly better.

Shorter Krugman:
Goooooo Obama! Surely this means a November win!
So much for economics being an honest scientific study, eh?

Lol. And so much for caring about the ... little people. Nevermind all those who have dropped out of the job market, or don't count as unemployed because the benefits have run out. Spin, spin, spin: Everything's getting better folks. We'll just borrow our way to happiness.*

(It's just surprising, the partisanship, coming from the prizewinning economist. The political reporters at the Times, well they're reporting the White House is popping the corks already. I guess things are good back in elite liberal land, and they're going to promise government goodies to keep the "very poor" nicely cushioned and wrapped up snug in that permanent safety net...)

---------------

* (and bail out the underwater mortgages, replace the missing parents, feed your kids breakfast lunch and dinner, and promise you the moon for little or no effort of your own, courtesy of fellow taxpayers. The promised Hope and Change rematerializes, just in time! ... Not.)

Susan Komen Foundation backs down.

After great media pressure pushing to connect the pink ribbons not just with breast cancer, but with abortion support of Planned Parenthood, they release a rather interesting statement:

“We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving lives,” the announcement said.

I wonder how many years it will take for the liberals to be honest about how many little lives, boys and girls, abortion kills every year. Of course, like civilian collateral damage, those numbers simply don't count in some circles.

I do wish liberal men like Rosenthal would stop speaking on behalf of all women though. Plenty of those, who might support breast cancer reseach but not at the cost of pitting this disease against that, will be very much turned off to the notion that "womens rights" necessarily include terminating life.

Before we move on to other topics, it’s worth noting a few things. Abortion is legal. It is a safe medical procedure. And it is rare. That’s exactly how it should be. Government has no business violating women’s privacy rights and making decisions about their reproductive rights. It is the worst kind of “big government” imaginable.
...
The Planned Parenthood flap threatened to put a stain on the Komen foundation’s reputation, and on its signature pink ribbon logo. That logo has become a major marketing device for an extraordinary range of products and services.


Enjoy your yogurt cup, Mr. Rosenthal. And your self-satisfied notions that you're... "helping" American women. (Just don't think about all the potentially disabled baby girls you're glad to see put down, so that their mothers are ... free to be. Ps. It's not such a "safe medical procedure" for the aborted growing child-to-be ... I guess as a man, you don't really get that.)

ADDED: Re. "Government has no business violating women’s privacy rights and making decisions about their reproductive rights."

How far do you suppose this extends? Does the government have the right to invade a woman's privacy and paternalistically impose health insurance purchase requirements on her behalf? Does the government have the right to tell a Catholic working woman that she must participate in a plan that pays for -- using her own premium dollars -- the contraceptive choices of co-workers? Why not ... go all the way, and allow true freedom?

Why do the Rosenthal men of the world get to be the deciders on behalf of equally intelligent women who would like to make their own personal medical choices on their own behalf, no government help or assistance from the Rosenthals of the world needed? If women have the right to decide whether an unborn child lives or dies, based on the flimsiest of convenient justifications, shouldn't another more conservative woman have the right to decide what her hard-earned dollars pay for, or not?

Friday Drama! @ Andrew's place

So stop watching already .

Don't just pray for the kid ... stop participating as part of the "audience" who obviously watches these things. They'll give the audience what they want all right; stop eating it up?

It was the reallest moment I have ever witnessed on reality television. It gave you a glimpse into the mindset of battered wives in abusive relationships and marriages - and the living hell that follows them every day. So why on earth go on a reality show? The wife suggested that she did it in order to stop the abuse - to get a third party to intervene and understand. The husband's motive? I have no idea. But being a wife-beater on national television must have been an ordeal. But here's what's unforgivable: they have a 5-year-old daughter exposed to all of this, a daughter who was with her mother when they found her father's body: "She knew something was bad. The first thing she said was, 'Did Daddy do something dumb?'" Armstrong recalled.

I find marital abuse so horrifying I cannot express my feelings. That simple sentence - "I almost wanted him to hit me during these fights just to get it over with" - stuck with me for days. The show trod a very fine line between brutal exploitation of these people's lives and absurd glorification of them.

I think it's pretty clear at this point that the combination took one life, arguably saved another, and took on a toll on a five year old whose longterm consequences we will never know. Pray for her.

Book V.

I TOLD ANTONIA I would come back, but life intervened, and it was twenty years before I kept my promise. I heard of her from time to time; that she married, very soon after I last saw her, a young Bohemian, a cousin of Anton Jelinek; that they were poor, and had a large family. Once when I was abroad I went into Bohemia, and from Prague I sent Antonia some photographs of her native village. Months afterward came a letter from her, telling me the names and ages of her many children, but little else; signed, 'Your old friend, Antonia Cuzak.' When I met Tiny Soderball in Salt Lake, she told me that Antonia had not 'done very well'; that her husband was not a man of much force, and she had had a hard life. Perhaps it was cowardice that kept me away so long. My business took me West several times every year, and it was always in the back of my mind that I would stop in Nebraska some day and go to see Antonia. But I kept putting it off until the next trip. I did not want to find her aged and broken; I really dreaded it. In the course of twenty crowded years one parts with many illusions. I did not wish to lose the early ones. Some memories are realities, and are better than anything that can ever happen to one again.

...

On my way East I broke my journey at Hastings, in Nebraska, and set off with an open buggy and a fairly good livery team to find the Cuzak farm. At a little past midday, I knew I must be nearing my destination. Set back on a swell of land at my right, I saw a wide farm-house, with a red barn and an ash grove, and cattle-yards in front that sloped down to the highroad. I drew up my horses and was wondering whether I should drive in here, when I heard low voices. Ahead of me, in a plum thicket beside the road, I saw two boys bending over a dead dog. The little one, not more than four or five, was on his knees, his hands folded, and his close-clipped, bare head drooping forward in deep dejection. The other stood beside him, a hand on his shoulder, and was comforting him in a language I had not heard for a long while. When I stopped my horses opposite them, the older boy took his brother by the hand and came toward me. He, too, looked grave. This was evidently a sad afternoon for them.

'Are you Mrs. Cuzak's boys?' I asked.

The younger one did not look up; he was submerged in his own feelings, but his brother met me with intelligent grey eyes. 'Yes, sir.'

'Does she live up there on the hill? I am going to see her. Get in and ride up with me.'

He glanced at his reluctant little brother. 'I guess we'd better walk. But we'll open the gate for you.'

I drove along the side-road and they followed slowly behind. When I pulled up at the windmill, another boy, barefooted and curly-headed, ran out of the barn to tie my team for me. He was a handsome one, this chap, fair-skinned and freckled, with red cheeks and a ruddy pelt as thick as a lamb's wool, growing down on his neck in little tufts. He tied my team with two flourishes of his hands, and nodded when I asked him if his mother was at home. As he glanced at me, his face dimpled with a seizure of irrelevant merriment, and he shot up the windmill tower with a lightness that struck me as disdainful. I knew he was peering down at me as I walked toward the house.

Ducks and geese ran quacking across my path. White cats were sunning themselves among yellow pumpkins on the porch steps. I looked through the wire screen into a big, light kitchen with a white floor. I saw a long table, rows of wooden chairs against the wall, and a shining range in one corner. Two girls were washing dishes at the sink, laughing and chattering, and a little one, in a short pinafore, sat on a stool playing with a rag baby. When I asked for their mother, one of the girls dropped her towel, ran across the floor with noiseless bare feet, and disappeared. The older one, who wore shoes and stockings, came to the door to admit me. She was a buxom girl with dark hair and eyes, calm and self-possessed.

'Won't you come in? Mother will be here in a minute.'

Before I could sit down in the chair she offered me, the miracle happened; one of those quiet moments that clutch the heart, and take more courage than the noisy, excited passages in life. Antonia came in and stood before me; a stalwart, brown woman, flat-chested, her curly brown hair a little grizzled. It was a shock, of course. It always is, to meet people after long years, especially if they have lived as much and as hard as this woman had. We stood looking at each other. The eyes that peered anxiously at me were--simply Antonia's eyes. I had seen no others like them since I looked into them last, though I had looked at so many thousands of human faces. As I confronted her, the changes grew less apparent to me, her identity stronger. She was there, in the full vigour of her personality, battered but not diminished, looking at me, speaking to me in the husky, breathy voice I remembered so well.

'My husband's not at home, sir. Can I do anything?'

'Don't you remember me, Antonia? Have I changed so much?'

She frowned into the slanting sunlight that made her brown hair look redder than it was. Suddenly her eyes widened, her whole face seemed to grow broader. She caught her breath and put out two hard-worked hands.

'Why, it's Jim! Anna, Yulka, it's Jim Burden!' She had no sooner caught my hands than she looked alarmed. 'What's happened? Is anybody dead?'

I patted her arm.

'No. I didn't come to a funeral this time. I got off the train at Hastings and drove down to see you and your family.'

She dropped my hand and began rushing about. 'Anton, Yulka, Nina, where are you all? Run, Anna, and hunt for the boys. They're off looking for that dog, somewhere. And call Leo. Where is that Leo!' She pulled them out of corners and came bringing them like a mother cat bringing in her kittens. 'You don't have to go right off, Jim? My oldest boy's not here. He's gone with papa to the street fair at Wilber. I won't let you go! You've got to stay and see Rudolph and our papa.' She looked at me imploringly, panting with excitement.

While I reassured her and told her there would be plenty of time, the barefooted boys from outside were slipping into the kitchen and gathering about her.

'Now, tell me their names, and how old they are.'

As she told them off in turn, she made several mistakes about ages, and they roared with laughter. When she came to my light-footed friend of the windmill, she said, 'This is Leo, and he's old enough to be better than he is.'

He ran up to her and butted her playfully with his curly head, like a little ram, but his voice was quite desperate. 'You've forgot! You always forget mine. It's mean! Please tell him, mother!' He clenched his fists in vexation and looked up at her impetuously.

She wound her forefinger in his yellow fleece and pulled it, watching him. 'Well, how old are you?'

'I'm twelve,' he panted, looking not at me but at her; 'I'm twelve years old, and I was born on Easter Day!'

She nodded to me. 'It's true. He was an Easter baby.'

The children all looked at me, as if they expected me to exhibit astonishment or delight at this information. Clearly, they were proud of each other, and of being so many. When they had all been introduced, Anna, the eldest daughter, who had met me at the door, scattered them gently, and came bringing a white apron which she tied round her mother's waist.

'Now, mother, sit down and talk to Mr. Burden. We'll finish the dishes quietly and not disturb you.'

Antonia looked about, quite distracted. 'Yes, child, but why don't we take him into the parlour, now that we've got a nice parlour for company?'

The daughter laughed indulgently, and took my hat from me. 'Well, you're here, now, mother, and if you talk here, Yulka and I can listen, too. You can show him the parlour after while.' She smiled at me, and went back to the dishes, with her sister. The little girl with the rag doll found a place on the bottom step of an enclosed back stairway, and sat with her toes curled up, looking out at us expectantly.

'She's Nina, after Nina Harling,' Antonia explained. 'Ain't her eyes like Nina's? I declare, Jim, I loved you children almost as much as I love my own. These children know all about you and Charley and Sally, like as if they'd grown up with you. I can't think of what I want to say, you've got me so stirred up. And then, I've forgot my English so. I don't often talk it any more. I tell the children I used to speak real well.' She said they always spoke Bohemian at home. The little ones could not speak English at all--didn't learn it until they went to school.

'I can't believe it's you, sitting here, in my own kitchen. You wouldn't have known me, would you, Jim? You've kept so young, yourself. But it's easier for a man. I can't see how my Anton looks any older than the day I married him. His teeth have kept so nice. I haven't got many left. But I feel just as young as I used to, and I can do as much work. Oh, we don't have to work so hard now! We've got plenty to help us, papa and me. And how many have you got, Jim?'

When I told her I had no children, she seemed embarrassed. 'Oh, ain't that too bad! Maybe you could take one of my bad ones, now? That Leo; he's the worst of all.' She leaned toward me with a smile. 'And I love him the best,' she whispered.

'Mother!' the two girls murmured reproachfully from the dishes.

Antonia threw up her head and laughed. 'I can't help it. You know I do. Maybe it's because he came on Easter Day, I don't know. And he's never out of mischief one minute!'

I was thinking, as I watched her, how little it mattered-- about her teeth, for instance. I know so many women who have kept all the things that she had lost, but whose inner glow has faded. Whatever else was gone, Antonia had not lost the fire of life. Her skin, so brown and hardened, had not that look of flabbiness, as if the sap beneath it had been secretly drawn away.

While we were talking, the little boy whom they called Jan came in and sat down on the step beside Nina, under the hood of the stairway. He wore a funny long gingham apron, like a smock, over his trousers, and his hair was clipped so short that his head looked white and naked. He watched us out of his big, sorrowful grey eyes.

'He wants to tell you about the dog, mother. They found it dead,' Anna said, as she passed us on her way to the cupboard.

Antonia beckoned the boy to her. He stood by her chair, leaning his elbows on her knees and twisting her apron strings in his slender fingers, while he told her his story softly in Bohemian, and the tears brimmed over and hung on his long lashes. His mother listened, spoke soothingly to him and in a whisper promised him something that made him give her a quick, teary smile. He slipped away and whispered his secret to Nina, sitting close to her and talking behind his hand.

When Anna finished her work and had washed her hands, she came and stood behind her mother's chair. 'Why don't we show Mr. Burden our new fruit cave?' she asked.

We started off across the yard with the children at our heels. The boys were standing by the windmill, talking about the dog; some of them ran ahead to open the cellar door. When we descended, they all came down after us, and seemed quite as proud of the cave as the girls were.

Ambrosch, the thoughtful-looking one who had directed me down by the plum bushes, called my attention to the stout brick walls and the cement floor. 'Yes, it is a good way from the house,' he admitted. 'But, you see, in winter there are nearly always some of us around to come out and get things.'

Anna and Yulka showed me three small barrels; one full of dill pickles, one full of chopped pickles, and one full of pickled watermelon rinds.

'You wouldn't believe, Jim, what it takes to feed them all!' their mother exclaimed. 'You ought to see the bread we bake on Wednesdays and Saturdays! It's no wonder their poor papa can't get rich, he has to buy so much sugar for us to preserve with. We have our own wheat ground for flour--but then there's that much less to sell.'

Nina and Jan, and a little girl named Lucie, kept shyly pointing out to me the shelves of glass jars. They said nothing, but, glancing at me, traced on the glass with their finger-tips the outline of the cherries and strawberries and crabapples within, trying by a blissful expression of countenance to give me some idea of their deliciousness.

'Show him the spiced plums, mother. Americans don't have those,' said one of the older boys. 'Mother uses them to make kolaches,' he added.

Leo, in a low voice, tossed off some scornful remark in Bohemian.

I turned to him. 'You think I don't know what kolaches are, eh? You're mistaken, young man. I've eaten your mother's kolaches long before that Easter Day when you were born.'

'Always too fresh, Leo,' Ambrosch remarked with a shrug.

Leo dived behind his mother and grinned out at me.

We turned to leave the cave; Antonia and I went up the stairs first, and the children waited. We were standing outside talking, when they all came running up the steps together, big and little, tow heads and gold heads and brown, and flashing little naked legs; a veritable explosion of life out of the dark cave into the sunlight. It made me dizzy for a moment.

The boys escorted us to the front of the house, which I hadn't yet seen; in farm-houses, somehow, life comes and goes by the back door. The roof was so steep that the eaves were not much above the forest of tall hollyhocks, now brown and in seed. Through July, Antonia said, the house was buried in them; the Bohemians, I remembered, always planted hollyhocks. The front yard was enclosed by a thorny locust hedge, and at the gate grew two silvery, mothlike trees of the mimosa family. From here one looked down over the cattle-yards, with their two long ponds, and over a wide stretch of stubble which they told me was a ryefield in summer.

At some distance behind the house were an ash grove and two orchards: a cherry orchard, with gooseberry and currant bushes between the rows, and an apple orchard, sheltered by a high hedge from the hot winds. The older children turned back when we reached the hedge, but Jan and Nina and Lucie crept through it by a hole known only to themselves and hid under the low-branching mulberry bushes.

As we walked through the apple orchard, grown up in tall bluegrass, Antonia kept stopping to tell me about one tree and another. 'I love them as if they were people,' she said, rubbing her hand over the bark. 'There wasn't a tree here when we first came. We planted every one, and used to carry water for them, too--after we'd been working in the fields all day. Anton, he was a city man, and he used to get discouraged. But I couldn't feel so tired that I wouldn't fret about these trees when there was a dry time. They were on my mind like children. Many a night after he was asleep I've got up and come out and carried water to the poor things. And now, you see, we have the good of them. My man worked in the orange groves in Florida, and he knows all about grafting. There ain't one of our neighbours has an orchard that bears like ours.'

In the middle of the orchard we came upon a grape arbour, with seats built along the sides and a warped plank table. The three children were waiting for us there. They looked up at me bashfully and made some request of their mother.

'They want me to tell you how the teacher has the school picnic here every year. These don't go to school yet, so they think it's all like the picnic.'

After I had admired the arbour sufficiently, the youngsters ran away to an open place where there was a rough jungle of French pinks, and squatted down among them, crawling about and measuring with a string.

'Jan wants to bury his dog there,' Antonia explained. 'I had to tell him he could. He's kind of like Nina Harling; you remember how hard she used to take little things? He has funny notions, like her.'

We sat down and watched them. Antonia leaned her elbows on the table. There was the deepest peace in that orchard. It was surrounded by a triple enclosure; the wire fence, then the hedge of thorny locusts, then the mulberry hedge which kept out the hot winds of summer and held fast to the protecting snows of winter. The hedges were so tall that we could see nothing but the blue sky above them, neither the barn roof nor the windmill. The afternoon sun poured down on us through the drying grape leaves. The orchard seemed full of sun, like a cup, and we could smell the ripe apples on the trees. The crabs hung on the branches as thick as beads on a string, purple-red, with a thin silvery glaze over them. Some hens and ducks had crept through the hedge and were pecking at the fallen apples. The drakes were handsome fellows, with pinkish grey bodies, their heads and necks covered with iridescent green feathers which grew close and full, changing to blue like a peacock's neck. Antonia said they always reminded her of soldiers--some uniform she had seen in the old country, when she was a child.

'Are there any quail left now?' I asked. I reminded her how she used to go hunting with me the last summer before we moved to town. 'You weren't a bad shot, Tony. Do you remember how you used to want to run away and go for ducks with Charley Harling and me?'

'I know, but I'm afraid to look at a gun now.' She picked up one of the drakes and ruffled his green capote with her fingers. 'Ever since I've had children, I don't like to kill anything. It makes me kind of faint to wring an old goose's neck. Ain't that strange, Jim?'

'I don't know. The young Queen of Italy said the same thing once, to a friend of mine. She used to be a great huntswoman, but now she feels as you do, and only shoots clay pigeons.'

'Then I'm sure she's a good mother,' Antonia said warmly.

She told me how she and her husband had come out to this new country when the farm-land was cheap and could be had on easy payments. The first ten years were a hard struggle. Her husband knew very little about farming and often grew discouraged. 'We'd never have got through if I hadn't been so strong. I've always had good health, thank God, and I was able to help him in the fields until right up to the time before my babies came. Our children were good about taking care of each other. Martha, the one you saw when she was a baby, was such a help to me, and she trained Anna to be just like her. My Martha's married now, and has a baby of her own. Think of that, Jim!

'No, I never got down-hearted. Anton's a good man, and I loved my children and always believed they would turn out well. I belong on a farm. I'm never lonesome here like I used to be in town. You remember what sad spells I used to have, when I didn't know what was the matter with me? I've never had them out here. And I don't mind work a bit, if I don't have to put up with sadness.' She leaned her chin on her hand and looked down through the orchard, where the sunlight was growing more and more golden.

'You ought never to have gone to town, Tony,' I said, wondering at her.

She turned to me eagerly.

'Oh, I'm glad I went! I'd never have known anything about cooking or housekeeping if I hadn't. I learned nice ways at the Harlings', and I've been able to bring my children up so much better. Don't you think they are pretty well-behaved for country children? If it hadn't been for what Mrs. Harling taught me, I expect I'd have brought them up like wild rabbits. No, I'm glad I had a chance to learn; but I'm thankful none of my daughters will ever have to work out. The trouble with me was, Jim, I never could believe harm of anybody I loved.'

...

As I wandered over those rough pastures, I had the good luck to stumble upon a bit of the first road that went from Black Hawk out to the north country; to my grandfather's farm, then on to the Shimerdas' and to the Norwegian settlement. Everywhere else it had been ploughed under when the highways were surveyed; this half-mile or so within the pasture fence was all that was left of that old road which used to run like a wild thing across the open prairie, clinging to the high places and circling and doubling like a rabbit before the hounds.

On the level land the tracks had almost disappeared--were mere shadings in the grass, and a stranger would not have noticed them. But wherever the road had crossed a draw, it was easy to find. The rains had made channels of the wheel-ruts and washed them so deeply that the sod had never healed over them. They looked like gashes torn by a grizzly's claws, on the slopes where the farm-wagons used to lurch up out of the hollows with a pull that brought curling muscles on the smooth hips of the horses. I sat down and watched the haystacks turn rosy in the slanting sunlight.

This was the road over which Antonia and I came on that night when we got off the train at Black Hawk and were bedded down in the straw, wondering children, being taken we knew not whither. I had only to close my eyes to hear the rumbling of the wagons in the dark, and to be again overcome by that obliterating strangeness. The feelings of that night were so near that I could reach out and touch them with my hand. I had the sense of coming home to myself, and of having found out what a little circle man's experience is. For Antonia and for me, this had been the road of Destiny; had taken us to those early accidents of fortune which predetermined for us all that we can ever be. Now I understood that the same road was to bring us together again. Whatever we had missed, we possessed together the precious, the incommunicable past.

They'll say...

We've got nothing in common.
No common ground to start from.
And we're falling apart.

You'll say,
the world has come between us.
Our lives have come between us.
But I know you just don't care.

Speaking of books ... My Antonia. Nevermind thumbing the pages, I haven't cracked that spine in a while. So while the little details are lost, I remember the takeaway theme:

It was a happy ending, don't you think? The narrator, voiced by Cather, returning to find his childhood friend a beacon of fecundity. A healthy, strong farmwoman, surrounded on all sides by her brood of growing gosling -- strong, healthy young men and women, expanding their holding, and growing in the prairies the next generation of the American Dream. (remember how Antonio's father made out early on, and how his grandchildren lived to see his dream through?)

Cather might not have chosen that life for herself, but in her work, she painted a portrait of the prairies and the people who came -- truly hungry and with little -- who made their way inland rejecting East Coast monied ways, to grow the country. Strong, hearty survivors ... like Antonia.

Cather didn't hit you over the head with the happiness -- she showed you the price paid, and again, when the reader goes back and encounters her with ... Jim Burden (I looked it up, the name she gave, that is), it's really up to the reader to decide if it's happy or sad. But I take that back, the part about the ending -- the emphasis on all the growing life around her, the beauty of those final pages in the reunion between the two, I never read that as an ending really...


Have a great Friday, and a healthy weekend.

Krugman Takes the Low Road.

The former Nobel Prize economics winner is writing from -- what, is it Paris* this month? -- about how Republican candidate Romney is in it for himself, while Krugman continues to boast the the Democrats are better at writing checks that their mouths can't cash.

In tight times,
with increased borrowing to sustain America's growing needs, Krugman astonishingly calls for more social spending. Nevermind that what we're doing now doesn't seem very promising to anyone with good long-term eyesight.

Now, the truth is that the safety net does need repair. It provides a lot of help to the poor, but not enough.

Similarly, food aid programs help a lot, but one in six Americans living below the poverty line suffers from “low food security.” This is officially defined as involving situations in which “food intake was reduced at times during the year because [households] had insufficient money or other resources for food” — in other words, hunger.

So we do need to strengthen our safety net. Mr. Romney, however, wants to make the safety net weaker instead.

I wonder, really, how many Americans Krugman has spoken to, or rubbed elbows with, in the last fiscal quarter. No really. No press "set ups" -- with specially chosen folks to "tell their story" to sympathetic elite like Krugman, when he's in town.

It's easy to imagine the "horrors" of all those Americans being on food stamps from your Paris hotel room, sympathetic to all those who don't have croissants of their own to put in their children's mouths...

I mean really. Did you know: there's really no "asset" test for food stamps in many places, it's solely income based. So if you are out of work, even if that means you're simply drawing off savings or maintaining your current standard of living, you qualify.

I know people -- it's not like they don't need the benefit. But via a divorce, "broken" families whose other incomes aren't taken into account, and an "off' work period ... the kid can qualify for free lunch, and a monthly food stamp allowance too. This offsets other items in the budget -- frees up money for the occasional movie, or MP3 download, or whatever else it is kids can spend pocket money on today...

My point is: let's not be overly dramatic. Let's not be so sympathetic, and overreaching in making our emotional pleas from above Mr. Krugman, that we don't understand ... true hunger. I'm sure some families honestly have rumbling tummies at bedtime, or would without the food allowance. So many children are trapped in "families" where poor choices are made, no "upward struggle" is present but the government-funded status quo is simply accepted, and MORE CHILDREN are born into povery daily. To me, that's the great crime.

Don't tell me how many poor children need government food and healthcare until you tell me your plans to curtail growing this population. Why do we continue to subsidize the growth of lower income families, at the cost of middle-income families who want to use their own scarce resources to invest in their own? Why should we pick the pockets of Peter's family, say, to pay for Paul's? Particularly if Paul has no plans, ever, to provide for his own, absent his government-benefit entitlements?

It's silly to keep growing, when you're doing it on borrowed money -- and time.

I just can't believe Krugman the economist is calling on yet MORE help for the lower classes via government programs. Prizes aside, has he learned nothing politically or economically in the past few years?

He writes: "At this rate, we may soon have politicians who admit what has been obvious all along: that they don’t care about the middle class either, that they aren’t concerned about the lives of ordinary Americans, and never were."

This might be a profound statement -- if the party he were pushing were making progress, had a plan, and showed us something promising, that was working. But... it's not.

All the pretty words in the world -- Krugman feels your pain from Paris, poor people, really and truly he does! -- are worth zip when they are fiscally undisciplined and don't produce. That's where we're at -- no spin, and I wish it weren't true.

The pundits, economic pundits even, know are qualified to judge a man's soul. They spin his words -- in the whole column, Krugman did not have the guts to write out Romney's full statement -- and think they can sink the man, and those who believe he'll be a better economic leader than those advising the current president.

But that doesn't put a warm healthy breakfast on the table at home. That doesn't create a dinner table where ideas are shared, days are discussed, and healthy nutrients are consumed.

Now, Krugman's counsel appears to be in checkwriting. Write more checks, to poor people who have demonstrated they have trouble planning ahead, and let them have the right to their choices ... without having to pay the costs. It's a bit like thinking that if you can take away the natural "hunger", then you teach uplift in another way. We're still waiting out here, Mr. Krugman. You know, for your "team" to teach the uplifting, and put in the time, and the work on the ground, to make effective, long-lasting structural change.

It's easy to write a check, and jump on a plane, and advise from above. And whine when you side doesn't much listen to you, instead of opening your eyes and figuring out a way to get the work done.

Even if it means, letting another person have a shot at making effective change for the good of all, not just this sympathetic group or that. Believe me, if there were a way to provide true opportunities via a freely functioning economy and a disciplined workforce, I betcha 80 percent of the people on food stamps would trade a big bag of Doritos for that chance.

I don't see the Democrats even bothering to promise that anymore. Instead, they just want to pay off poor people to accept the bare minimums, and if that doesn't work, dangle another pittance or two.

That's not how you get ahead, nor achieve personal independence.
I wonder why, over in Paris, Krugman the elite would want to discourage that here at home? I sure hope people aren't dumb enough to keep falling for it though. The empty promises of hope and change that don't materialize in substance, vs. programs targeted at making America more healthy, competitive, honest, and free.

Don't stop thinking about tomorrow, indeed.

----------------------

* Actually for Paul, we're not in Paris anymore.
January 30, 2012, 4:17 pm
Eurozone Problems
I’m giving a talk in Paris tomorrow. Here are some slides; they won’t come as a shock to regular readers, but it may be useful to see them all in one place.

February 2, 2012, 12:33 pm
From Russia, With Exhaustion
I’m in Moscow, and utterly wiped by the combination of cold, jet lag, and too many interminable panel sessions. Normal blogging should resume this weekend.

He's moved on Russia ... "utterly exhausted" from sitting in an airplane seat, too tired to type and think any further, presumably. Heh. And this guy pretends to be a concerned, genuine friend to the working man. With all the answers, but somehow, none of the committment to the task, to stay home and see his work through to actual results...

Remember what happened to Krugman's Army, kids. I think he was AWOL in Canada when that protest movement failed, no? Oh well, there's always a bag of Doritos to keep you happy until the lecturing leader returns...

(Give me Mitt Romney's cold record of results over that, anyday.)

Thursday, February 2

"Render Unto Caesar What Is Caesar's ..."

and unto God the things that are God's."

Ah, I see the president is busy today publicly proclaiming his Christianity, pushing the Golden Rule (that seems to have disappeared in his foreign policies of late), and telling us how he interprets the Gospel as someone blessed, who is called upon personally to give more (to Caesar, presumably for redistribution).

I wonder if he's read far enough into the Book, not just to pull out scripture as his campaign needs, but to understand what Jesus was telling us in this story?

Narrative: The synoptic gospels state that hostile questioners tried to trap Jesus into taking an explicit and dangerous stand on whether Jews should or should not pay taxes to the Roman authorities. The accounts in Matthew and Mark say that the questioners were Pharisees and Herodians, while Luke says only that they were "spies" sent by "teachers of the law and the chief priests".

They anticipated that Jesus would oppose the tax, as their purpose was "to hand him over to the power and authority of the governor" (Luke 20:20). The governor was Pilate, and he was the man responsible for the collecting of taxes in Roman Judea. At first the questioners flattered Jesus by praising his integrity, impartiality, and devotion to truth. Then they asked him whether or not it is right for Jews to pay the taxes demanded by Caesar. In the Gospel of Mark (12:15) the additional, provocative question is asked, "Should we pay or shouldn't we?" Jesus first called them hypocrites, and then asked one of them to produce a Roman coin that would be suitable for paying Caesar's tax. One of them showed him a Roman coin, and he asked them whose name and inscription were on it. They answered, "Caesar's," and he responded

"Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." The questioners were impressed (Matthew 22:22 states that they "marvelled", ἐθαύμασαν) and satisfied with the answer, they went away.

Doctrinal context: Jesus was asked the question about paying taxes in hope that he would answer "yes" or "no". Answering "yes" would have left him open to the accusation that he was in opposition to Jewish resistance to the Roman occupation and therefore (given the assumption by the Jews that they still held privileged nation status with God at this time) against God, too. Answering "no" would have given those present an opportunity to report him to the Roman authorities as someone who was trying to incite a revolt. His questioners had assumed that there was an inevitable (and hazardous) dichotomy between discharging one's obligations to the state and discharging one's obligations to God, but Jesus refused to confront the dichotomy as framed by his hostile questioners and instead pointed to the assumptions behind it.

The episode illustrates Jesus' skill in holding his ground in doctrinal debates and rhetorics against the orthodox Jewish scholars of the time.

Ah, ;-)
they'll always be with us.

ADDED: Interestingly enough, that same scripture passage might be used as an example of State's rights. Render unto the federal government all that outlined in The Constitution. But everything else not spelled out? That is reserved to the States, just as everything not Caesar's belongs to G-d.

It's not so much about money, but about freedoms and who decides what is owed to whom. President Obama should take care not to let his speechwriters overstep, as even Jesus did not.

What’s a Republican Feminist To Do?

asks the NYTimes.

In the winter line-up of Republican presidential candidates, a moderate pro-choice Republican woman has no choice. She might feel as if she were so, well, last century.

Thankfully, women have medical, technological, educational and social options to prevent pregnancy before an intentional abortion occurs that were not available to the women of yesteryear.

Here's an idea: educate yourself on birth control methods, remember to use whatever method(s) you choose -- even if you have spontaneous sex, or get drunk and tipsy, and ask yourself perhaps before you choose to conceive if you would be comfortable raising a "non perfect" disabled child, or one that might otherwise have a superficial characteristic that you're not dreaming of in your "perfect family".

Honestly, if you follow these simple steps -- as I'm confident the majority of American women can, educated and well-to-do or not -- you'll probably never be called upon to make that "choice" of having to terminate an unborn growing person's life, or not.

Does that help any, "Republican Feminist Voter"?

Personally? I like what I'm hearing.

Whether Boomer pundits such as Gail Collins like it or not, someday, we're going to have to get serious in political circles.

No more talking nonsense, like dogs strapped to the roofs of cars, and wives strapped to hospital beds served with divorce papers. That's for those who want to divert our focus.

Serious financial choices are ahead -- some that might seem to pit young against old, native-born against immigrants, "old money" against newly earned.

Like it or not,
we're going to have to talk entitlements -- all government entitlements, those going to the old and young, the rich and the struggling, the upper-classes and the lower.

I say like it or not, because some are determined to inject race into the talk, and therefore, think they can dominate discussion. Nope. One day, we'll have to face the numbers and realize: demographically and financially, the budget needs a-fixin'.

We can play games, you know, as in selective editing...

But personally? I like what I'm hearing.
I too am not concerned about the very poor. The government need not take on a bigger charity care role. Those on monthly government checks might have a lower quality of life, but nobody's starving. If anything, they're getting overfed with factory food, thanks to free food stamp programs that encourage empty caloric consumption.

Not all.

Plenty of people on food stamps budget wisely. And again, please don't talk about race, but numbers. If more and more people are to access our disability rolls, and need financial help to feed their families, that needs to be addressed.

As does the coming troubles of aging Boomers. If our current entitlement guarantees are kept, we will paying for their health bills, and their retirement needs, out of the pockets of taxpayers to come.

Can we talk about that?

Again, the "safety net" programs for the very poor are already in place. Not much, but survival level. But in years to come?

How can we continue growing an entitlement class -- and again, I point you to those aging demographic numbers and upper-middle-class entitlements via government promises and tax shelters. Let the special interests squawk about race all they like -- this really isn't about black people or brown people or poor white trash.

It's about the numbers.
Don't you see that?

President Obama promised he'd start a national conversation on race, to move us forward past our discomforts, to help some "get over" and recognize their role with no special conditions attached. Honest competition.

Truth be told? I'm not much worried about the upper-middle-class black offspring either. With special programs like affirmative action, much like "equal" outcomes guaranteed for special-education and disabled children in our school districts, they've got plenty of non-profit and government-grant-supported programs advocating for their special needs. Plus, special protection legislation that you'd don't dare cross, lest you be charged with "hate crime" enhancers, big lawsuits, and accusations of not caring about the lowliest in our society.

We can quibble about whether or not the offspring of middle-class black folk heading off to colleges really need special financial enhancements, or special admissions policies to "help offset their cultural disadvantages". But let's not, now...

Let's talk about the middle-class working people above the poverty line, who don't rely long-term on government programs and help to pay their bills. Somebody needs to lead this economy, to open up more opportunities for honest competition. So that meritorious ideas and honest efforts, and most importantly -- RESULTS -- are rewarded, and not condemned, overly taxed, or criticized for positive performance.

Let's face it:
Mitt Romney is a "clean" candidate. No Clinton/Schwarzenegger/Kennedy/Gingrich multiple-sexual extra curriculars will be found. I'd guarantee that.

And though the media is trying their darndest,
there's no blatant racial discrimination or special-interest backroom deals that will come to light, casting questions about the man's character. (Extreme pet lovers, who've never seen a dog ride in the open back of a pickup, aside...)

Mostly, there's a history of success in business, playing by the established rules. There's a track record not only of hard work, but of RESULTS, in governing and organization leadership.

(Aside: might I remind you of those of us who pointed out this was definitely lacking in the resume of young, junior senator, candidate Obama? Results have borne us out: he seemed to have lacked the will to take the reins, and instead was "talked into" some pretty poor domestic policies that clearly are not what the economy currently needs...)

Honestly, if you listen, enough of the Democrat pundits tell you they're cheering for Gingrich, hurling their racial/poor accusations at the party as a whole, denigrating the discourse deliberately. I don't think it's gonna stick on candidate Romney though.

You may say he's unlikeable. That he's not from a "warmer" culture, like yours perhaps. But you really have to have some solid evidence if you're trying to spin the man into Mr. Evil, instead of wealthy Grandpa and Latter Day Saint.

Collins' pitch today was weak.
We all know, in this 24-hour media day, what was missing in the ...

The only people who will be convinced by her appeal to emotion are those already solidly in the pro-Obama camp, who have convinced themselves to look past all his job performance faults, because ... gawd forbid we elect a competent Republican to the job.

I don't know.
I'm clearly a political independent by now. I listen, I read, I think about what I see, who needs help, and who is more likely to prove a positive investment in the America of tomorrow.

We can take care of the needs of the very poor, sure. And the elderly -- rich and poor, and the various family configurations out there who need the government to step in and play Papa (or Mama) because some man or woman isn't able to meet their own family's financial needs.

But this surely isn't where we expect the productivity that will lift other societal boats, and produce a positive return on our rate of investment. No, this is government as charity. Give sure, but don't expect ever to be "paid back".

Romney is right not too worry too much about those whose basic needs are met already by government programs. He's right to call for more fiscal discipline, and an end to perverse incentives that take no account of the growing demands placed on middle-class pocketbooks.

The rise in the price of gas; daily commodities like milk, eggs and butter; the low interest rates, that do nothing to encourage long-term savings and investment, over immediate consumption...

Some will tell you the recession is over, good times are back again, and time to stop thinking so cautiously, to spend and buy our way back into happiness -- nevermind the growing government programs and individual economic freedoms and choices that are being curtailed as the government demands more and more into our private lives to pay for their promises.

I'd like to have an honest conversation about our immigration policy first, way before we extend any additional government healthcare programs. If you have undocumented, unprotected lower-class workers, you can expect poor labor conditions and further need for emergency treatment care. For their soon-to-be born children, and their own health needs. Would you be so callous to call them "free riders"?

You know, the people -- were they recognized American citizens not falling into the ranks of the "very poor" -- who would be called to contribute to private insurance company profits under the Individual Mandate? If the fix doesn't truly address the problem, and then there's that federal Constitutionality thing as well, why not promise to reverse course while there's still time?

Substance-wise, I like what Mr. Romney is saying. I think a lot of us out here, who don't fall into some minority special-interest category, do. I'm not so sure that pandering to the worser angels of our nature will do the trick, Ms. Collins.

I'm not sure, exactly, what price the country will pay if it did. I assure though though, it's not going to be a positive gain, only a cheap short-term victory, trying to divide us up like this.

I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.

Wednesday, February 1

Our Lives...

are better left to chance...
I could have missed the pain
But I'd of had to miss, the dance.


Some days, when it's black and white and grey,
and not a color in the sky or on the ground
but melting snow, you roll down the window a bit
appreciate the moisture in the air, and think:
They picked the right song to play today...

Pain in that boy's voice,
he must of been singing 'bout
a melting February day.
Dontcha think?